Googling a bit there seems to be little difference between them ( seems just a matter of preference). Phabrictor was created at Facebook and suspect the additional committers from FB to Hbase and as Hive started there led to them switching ( since I bet they don't want to context switch either).
review board works well /******************************************* Joe Stein Founder, Principal Consultant Big Data Open Source Security LLC http://www.stealth.ly Twitter: @allthingshadoop ********************************************/ On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Jay Kreps <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally I would prefer review board as we are using it for Samza and > also at LinkedIn and switching between tools drives me nuts. Does > phabricator have any particularly good features? > > If someone else is willing to do the leg work, though, I will take whatever > they set up. > > -Jay > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Neha Narkhede > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I personally like the phabricator tool for code reviews and accepting >> patches - http://phabricator.org/ >> Some big top level Apache projects have adopted phabricator as well - >> Hive<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2486>and >> HBase <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4611> >> >> If we can't do this for some reason, I don't mind review board which is >> better than what we do today. >> >> Thanks, >> Neha >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jay Kreps <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would like to get review board set up for Kafka. We have gone around >> and >>> around on different tools, but never actually did anything. I find the >> JIRA >>> bullet list style of code review pretty unusable. Any objections? >>> >>> -Jay >>> >>
