[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13772450#comment-13772450
]
Neha Narkhede commented on KAFKA-1018:
--------------------------------------
[~joestein] This is marked for the 0.8 final release. Do you think you could
help look into this?
> tidy up the POM from what feedback has come from the 0.8 beta and publishing
> to maven
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-1018
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1018
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Joe Stein
> Fix For: 0.8
>
>
> from Chris Riccomini
> 1. Maven central can't resolve it properly (POM is different from Apache
> release). Have to use Apache release repo directly to get things to work.
> 2. Exclusions must be manually applied even though they exist in Kafka's POM
> already. I think Maven can handle this automatically, if the POM is done
> right.
> 3. Weird parent block in Kafka POMs that points to org.apache.
> 4. Would be nice to publish kafka-test jars as well.
> 5. Would be nice to have SNAPSHOT releases off of trunk using a Hudson job.
> Our hypothesis regarding the first issue is that it was caused by duplicate
> publishing during testing, and it should go away in the future.
> Regarding number 2, I have to explicitly exclude the following when depending
> on Kafka:
> exclude module: 'jms'
> exclude module: 'jmxtools'
> exclude module: 'jmxri'
> I believe these just need to be excluded from the appropriate jars in the
> actual SBT build file, to fix this issue. I see JMS is excluded from ZK, but
> it's probably being pulled in from somewhere else, anyway.
> Regarding number 3, it is indeed listed as something to do on the Apache
> publication page (http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html).
> I can't find an example of anyone using it, but it doesn't seem to be doing
> any harm.
> Also, regarding your intransitive() call, that is disabling ALL dependencies
> not just the exclusions, I believe. I think that the "proper" way to do that
> would be to do what I've done: exclude("jms", "jmxtools", "jmxri").
> Regardless, fixing number 2, above, should mean that intransitive()/exclude()
> are not required.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
