Hi Colin, Thanks for raising these 2 valid points. I've updated the KIP accordingly.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:50 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > Thanks for the KIP! > > Just some minor comments. > > 1. Java class names are stale, e.g. "CommitOffsetsOptions.java" should be > "AlterOffsetsOptions". > > 2. I'd suggest we change the future structure of "AlterOffsetsResult" to > > *KafkaFuture<Map<TopicPartition, KafkaFuture<Void>>>* > > This is because we will have a hierarchy of two-layers of errors since we > need to find out the group coordinator first and then issue the commit > offset request (see e.g. the ListConsumerGroupOffsetsResult which exclude > partitions that have errors, or the DeleteMembersResult as part of KIP-345). > > If the discover-coordinator returns non-triable error, we would set it on > the first layer of the KafkaFuture, and the per-partition error would be > set on the second layer of the KafkaFuture. > > > Guozhang > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:36 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > Considering that KIP-496, which adds a way of deleting consumer offsets > > from AdminClient, looks like it is going to get in, this seems like > > functionality we should definitely have. > > > > For alterConsumerGroupOffsets, is the intention to ignore partitions that > > are not specified in the map? If so, we should specify that in the JavaDoc. > > > > isolationLevel seems like it should be an enum rather than a string. The > > existing enum is in org.apache.kafka.common.requests, so we should probably > > create a new one which is public in org.apache.kafka.clients.admin. > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019, at 06:10, Mickael Maison wrote: > > > Bumping this thread once again > > > > > > Ismael, have I answered your questions? > > > While this has received a few non-binding +1s, no committers have > > > voted yet. If you have concerns or questions, please let me know. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:51 AM Mickael Maison > > > <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Bumping this thread as it's been a couple of weeks. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:26 PM Mickael Maison < > > mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ismael for the feedback. I think your point has 2 parts: > > > > > - Having the reset functionality in the AdminClient: > > > > > The fact we have a command line tool illustrate that this operation > > is > > > > > relatively common. I seems valuable to be able to perform this > > > > > operation directly via a proper API in addition of the CLI tool. > > > > > > > > > > - Sending an OffsetCommit directly instead of relying on > > KafkaConsumer: > > > > > The KafkaConsumer requires a lot of stuff to commit offsets. Its > > group > > > > > cannot change so you need to start a new Consumer every time, that > > > > > creates new connections and overal sends more requests. Also there > > are > > > > > already a bunch of AdminClient APIs that have logic very close to > > > > > what needs to be done to send a commit request, keeping the code > > small > > > > > and consistent. > > > > > > > > > > I've updated the KIP with these details and moved the 2nd part to > > > > > "Proposed changes" as it's more an implementation detail. > > > > > > > > > > I hope this answers your question > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 7:41 PM Ismael Juma <isma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The KIP doesn't discuss the option of using KafkaConsumer directly > > as far > > > > > > as I can tell. We have tried to avoid having the same > > functionality in > > > > > > multiple clients so it would be good to explain why this is > > necessary here > > > > > > (not saying it isn't). > > > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 10:29 AM Mickael Maison < > > mickael.mai...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ryanne for the feedback, all suggestions sounded good, > > I've > > > > > > > updated the KIP accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:43 PM Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I suggest: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - drop "get" from getOffset, getTimestamp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - add to the motivation section why this is better than > > constructing a > > > > > > > > KafkaConsumer and using seek(), commit() etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - add some rejected alternatives. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 7:57 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have +4 non-binding for this vote. Is there any committer > > who is > > > > > > > > > interested in this issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Dongjin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 21/01/2019, 12:45, "Eno Thereska" < > > eno.there...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:30 PM Mickael Maison < > > > > > > > > > > mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bumping this thread. Considering this KIP is > > relatively straigh > > > > > > > > > > > forward, can we get some votes or feedback if you > > think it's > > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:40 PM Edoardo Comar < > > > > > > > edoco...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Mickael! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 17:39, Patrik Kleindl < > > > > > > > pklei...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, sounds very helpful > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 08.01.2019 um 18:10 schrieb Mickael Maison < > > > > > > > > > > > mickael.mai...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-396: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fpages%2Fviewpage.action%3FpageId%3D97551484&data=02%7C01%7C%7C47c103e1919142c35d7c08d67f9e4c5d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636836715187389495&sdata=ihLaSXvB8C%2BK%2F%2BWjVDqKXgUJoRDmwfIi7FvFLRzmFe4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > "When the people fear their government, there is > > tyranny; > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > government fears the people, there is liberty." > > [Thomas > > > > > > > > > Jefferson] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > *Dongjin Lee* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.* > > > > > > > > > *github: <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr > > > > > > > > > <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin: > > > > > > > kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr > > > > > > > > > <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck: > > > > > > > > > speakerdeck.com/dongjin > > > > > > > > > <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang
