The proposed interface does not look like the Builder pattern I am used to.
Should SslEngineBuilder be called SslEngineFactory instead?
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, at 03:33, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> I would expect SslEngineBuilder interface to look something like this,
> perhaps with some tweaking:
>
> public interface SslEngineBuilder extends Configurable, Closeable {
>
> Set<String> reconfigurableConfigs();
>
> boolean shouldBeRebuilt(Map<String, Object> nextConfigs);
>
> SSLEngine createSslEngine(Mode mode, String peerHost, int
> peerPort, String endpointIdentification);
>
> }
