Hi Ron/Colin, Thanks for the responses. I think we need to consider these cases:
1) The recommended approach: This is the one we document. Configs consistent with Kafka make sense here. It seems a lot more confusing to configure `ssl.cipher.suites`, `ssl.enabled.protocols`, ` zookeeper.ssl.ciphersuites` and `zookeeper.ssl.enabledProtocols` with multiple naming inconsistencies in server.properties. For users who have never used ZK system properties, this is clearly simpler. Another config to consider is `ssl.endpoint.identification.algorithm` which does the same thing as `zookeeper.ssl.hostnameVerification` - if we are staying consistent, we should use the Kafka format for this too. I would also consider using something like `zookeeper.client.ssl.enabled` instead of ` zookeeper.client.secure` since it is difficult to tell what `secure` means when you have options to configure Kerberos, ACLs and/or SSL. 2) Inheritance using prefixed configs as we do for other prefixed configs in Kafka: I think it may be useful for configs like `ssl.protocol` and ` ssl.cipher.suites`. 3) Default values: Do we want to use Kafka defaults? The inconsistency we have is `ssl.protocol/ssl.enabled.protocols` since we still have insecure protocols enabled for Kafka. We have KIP-553 ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=142641956) open to disable these. It is currently blocked since it also talks about enabling TLSv1.3 by default and we haven't done sufficient testing for that. Since it will be good to disable the older insecure protocols anyway, perhaps we could do that without enabling TLSv1.3 by default in 2.5? 4) Backward compatibility for deployments which are using system properties. We shouldn't override system properties with Kafka defaults or inherited values. But we do want to override if user configures properties explicitly. In the current approach, this was simpler since we just had to set the configured values. But if we decide to inherit Kafka configs, then we will need to check system properties and update accordingly. But that should be doable? On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:51 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 13:41, Ron Dagostino wrote: > > Hi Colin. Two things come to mind with respect to ZooKeeper camelCase > > style vs Kafka-style config names for ZooKeeper. First, I think it > > would be desirable for the client configs and broker configs to be > > interoperable. For example, it feels like it would be convenient to > > be able to pass the broker's config file to the ZK Security Migrator > > tool. I think whatever we use (ZooKeeper camelCase style or Kafka > > style), I think we should use the same for both. > > > > The second thing to think about is the fact that ZooKeeper > > configuration inherently uses Java system properties as a first pass. > > So while we might switch to Kafka-style configs in the config file > > (e.g. zookeeper.ssl.trust.store.location), the > > org.apache.zookeeper.client.ZKClientConfig class (which is how TLS > > configs are set) is going to look for the camelCase > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.location system property and use any value > > there. I think this could be very confusing for people. Granted, we > > are doing this so that people don't have to use system properties, but > > there is no way to turn off the use of system properties, so I think > > there would be pretty substantial potential for confusion. > > I don't think we document or recommend that anyone use system properties > to configure Zookeeper usage within Kafka. And I think the reason is > exactly the issue you pointed out -- it wouldn't be consistent with our > other configurations. > > best, > Colin > > > > > One idea is to migrate the system properties -- i.e. look to see if > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.location is set and if it is clear out the > > value there and move it under the zookeeper.ssl.trust.store.location > > system property. (I said it was an idea -- not necessarily a good one > > :-) > > > > Ron > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 10:53, Ron Dagostino wrote: > > > > Thanks Colin and Rajini. > > > > > > > > I've updated the KIP to say that KIP-421 functionality is available > to > > > > encrypt sensitive configs like the ZK key store and trust store > > > > passwords. (I've also made it clear that the configs are not > > > > dynamically reconfigurable since dynamic values are stored in ZK and > > > > the data is needed to get to ZK in the first place). Colin, let me > > > > know if you think anything else needs to be said/done about it -- I > > > > wasn't sure if your comment above implies that there are additional > > > > direct actions that we need to take aside from this. > > > > > > > > I agree that making the brokers' ZooKeeper clients dynamic with > > > > respect to key and trust stores (e.g. via > > > > zookeeper.ssl.context.supplier.class) may increase the risk that this > > > > KIP may not land in time for 2.5. > > > > > > > > Regarding the config names for ZK being different than the ZooKeeper > > > > configs (e.g. camel-case keyStore/trustStore instead of > > > > keystore/truststore, ciphersuites instead of cipher.suites, > > > > enabledProtocols instead of enabled.protocols), I agree it is an > > > > issue. I tried to mitigate it by putting warning text in the config > > > > docs for these. Regarding configuration inheritance, I think what > you > > > > are saying is that for any configs where the broker has a clear > > > > semantic equivalent, the broker could fall back to the broker value > if > > > > the ZK value is not given. The potential list is: > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.location => ssl.keystore.location > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.password => ssl.keystore.password > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.type => ssl.keystore.type > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.location => ssl.truststore.location > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.password => ssl.truststore.password > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.type => ssl.truststore.type > > > > zookeeper.ssl.ciphersuites => ssl.cipher.suites > > > > > > > > Note that there are two configs that look the same based on their key > > > > names but whose allowable values differ: > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.protocol(Default: TLSv1.2) => ssl.protocol(Default: > TLS) > > > > zookeeper.ssl.enabledProtocols(Default: value of protocol property) = > > > > ssl.enabled.protocols(Default: TLSv1.2,TLSv1.1,TLSv1) > > > > > > > > Not sure what the right answer is, but hopefully this detail will > help > > > > get us there. > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > I think, on balance, I agree with Rajini that it would be nice to make > the configs look more like Kafka configs. We don't have camel-case in > configuration keys, so we should avoid it here. > > > > > > best, > > > Colin > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:26 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, at 11:49, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation, sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > A few more questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) At the moment, all sensitive broker configs including > > > > > > keystore/truststore passwords can be stored encrypted in > ZooKeeper prior to > > > > > > starting up brokers. We are now adding SSL keystore/truststore > passwords > > > > > > for ZooKeeper client that cannot be stored in ZooKeeper since > you need > > > > > > these to connect to ZK. We should perhaps document that these > configs can > > > > > > be encrypted using KIP-421. > > > > > > > > > > That's a good point. Previously, we didn't have ZK on-the-wire > security support. However, now that we do, sending sensitive keystore and > truststore passwords to ZK in cleartext should be deprecated in favor of > using KIP-421. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) We can dynamically update keystores and trust stores used by > brokers > > > > > > without restarting the broker. Can we support this easily for ZK > clients > > > > > > created by the broker, for example by adding our own > > > > > > `zookeeper.ssl.context.supplier.class`? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm. That might be better to consider in a follow-up, since the > deadline for 2.5 KIPs is coming up? > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > > Colin > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Looks like we are using config names that directly map to ZK > configs. > > > > > > Have we considered using equivalent Kafka config names with > prefixes, > > > > > > perhaps with inheritance from the non-prefixed names? Not sure > if this is a > > > > > > good idea, but perhaps worth documenting in Rejected > Alternatives at least. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 5:14 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation. I guess thinking about it a > little bit more, > > > > > > > we should just add --zk-tls-config-file to all of these > commands. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We will be removing this option (plus ZK in general) from > these commands > > > > > > > in the next major release, but ZK is still supported in 2.5, > so we should > > > > > > > just do the logical thing. (The exception is > ZkSecurityMigrator, which > > > > > > > will stay). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > > > > Colin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, at 07:38, Ron Dagostino wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Colin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< It seems like this [--zk-tls-config-file information] > could just > > > > > > > appear > > > > > > > > in a configuration file, which all of these tools already > accept (I > > > > > > > think) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZkSecurityMigrator has no such property file facility; > adding a > > > > > > > > "--zk-tls-config-file" parameter is exactly for this > purpose. If we add > > > > > > > > that to ZkSecurityMigrator then it is trivial to add it to > other commands > > > > > > > > (the same code is simply reused; it ends up being just a few > extra > > > > > > > lines). > > > > > > > > I do not see any parameter in the other two commands to > adjust the ZK > > > > > > > > connection; ConfigCommand accepts a "--command-config" flag, > but > > > > > > > according > > > > > > > > to the code "This is used only with --bootstrap-server > option for > > > > > > > > describing and altering broker configs." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do agree there would be no need to add > "--zk-tls-config-file" to > > > > > > > > ReassignPartitionsCommand if its direct ZK connectivity is > replaced in > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > for the next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ConfigCommand supports the "--bootstrap-server" option and > will have its > > > > > > > > direct ZooKeeper access formally deprecated as per KIP-555, > but the > > > > > > > special > > > > > > > > use case of bootstrapping a ZooKeeper ensemble with > encrypted credentials > > > > > > > > prior to starting Kafka will still exist, so it feels like > while > > > > > > > > "--zk-tls-config-file" would never be used except for this > use case it > > > > > > > > could probably still be added for this particular situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I responded on 1/6 but I just discovered that e, ail > (and 3 more I > > > > > > > > sent) did not go through. I am trying to get emails through > now to move > > > > > > > > this discussion forward. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 5:07 PM Colin McCabe < > cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, at 10:48, Ron Dagostino wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone. I would like to make the following changes > to the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MOTIVATION: > > > > > > > > > > Include a statement that it will be difficult in the > short term to > > > > > > > > > > deprecate direct Zookeeper communication in > kafka-configs.{sh, bat} > > > > > > > > > (which > > > > > > > > > > invoke kafka.admin.ConfigCommand) because bootstrapping > a Kafka > > > > > > > cluster > > > > > > > > > > with encrypted passwords in Zookeeper is an > explicitly-supported use > > > > > > > > > case; > > > > > > > > > > therefore it is in scope to be able to securely > configure the CLI > > > > > > > tools > > > > > > > > > > that still leverage non-deprecated direct Zookeeper > communication > > > > > > > for TLS > > > > > > > > > > (the other 2 tools are kafka-reassign-partitions.{sh, > bat} and > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper-security-migration.sh). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About deprecations: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * zookeeper-security-migration: clearly, deprecating ZK > access in this > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > would not make sense, since it would defeat the whole > point of the > > > > > > > tool :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * kafka-reassign-partitions: ZK access should be > deprecated here. > > > > > > > KIP-455 > > > > > > > > > implementation has dragged a bit, but this should get done > soon. > > > > > > > Certainly > > > > > > > > > before the next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * kafka-configs: I think ZK access should be deprecated > here as well. > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > agree there is a super-special bootstrapping case here, > but that should > > > > > > > > > have its own tool, not use kafka-configs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will post a separate KIP for this, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GOALS: > > > > > > > > > > Support the secure configuration of TLS-encrypted > communication > > > > > > > between > > > > > > > > > > Zookeeper and: > > > > > > > > > > a) Kafka brokers > > > > > > > > > > b) The three CLI tools mentioned above that still > support direct, > > > > > > > > > > non-deprecated communication to Zookeeper > > > > > > > > > > It is explicitly out-of-scope to deprecate any direct > Zookeeper > > > > > > > > > > communication in CLI tools as part of this KIP; such > work will occur > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > future KIPs instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PUBLIC INTERFACES: > > > > > > > > > > 1) The following new broker configurations will be > recognized. > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.client.secure (default value = false, for > backwards > > > > > > > > > > compatibility) > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.clientCnxnSocket > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.location > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.password > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.location > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.password > > > > > > > > > > It will be an error for any of the last 5 values to be > left > > > > > > > unspecified > > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.client.secure is explicitly set to true. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) In addition, the > kafka.security.authorizer.AclAuthorizer class > > > > > > > > > supports > > > > > > > > > > the ability to connect to a different Zookeeper instance > than the > > > > > > > one the > > > > > > > > > > brokers use. We therefore also add the following > optional configs, > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > override the corresponding ones from above when present: > > > > > > > > > > authorizer.zookeeper.client.secure > > > > > > > > > > authorizer.zookeeper.clientCnxnSocket > > > > > > > > > > authorizer.zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.location > > > > > > > > > > authorizer.zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.password > > > > > > > > > > authorizer.zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.location > > > > > > > > > > authorizer.zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.password > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) The three CLI tools mentioned above will support a new > > > > > > > > > --zk-tls-config-file > > > > > > > > > > <String: Zookeeper TLS configuration file path>" > option. The > > > > > > > following > > > > > > > > > > properties will be recognized in that file, and > unrecognized > > > > > > > properties > > > > > > > > > > will be ignored to allow the possibility of pointing > > > > > > > zk-tls-config-file > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > the broker's config file. > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.client.secure (default value = false) > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.clientCnxnSocket > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.location > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.keyStore.password > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.location > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.ssl.trustStore.password > > > > > > > > > > It will be an error for any of the last 5 values to be > left > > > > > > > unspecified > > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper.client.secure is explicitly set to true. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we really need a --zk-tls-config-file flag? It seems > like this > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > just appear in a configuration file, which all of these > tools already > > > > > > > > > accept (I think). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > > > > > > Colin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:03 PM Ron Dagostino < > rndg...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone. Let's get this discussion going again > now that Kafka > > > > > > > 2.4 > > > > > > > > > > > with Zookeeper 3.5.6 is out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, regarding the KIP number, the other KIP that > was using this > > > > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > > moved to KIP 534, so KIP 515 remains the correct > number for this > > > > > > > > > > > discussion. I've updated the Kafka Improvement > Proposal page to > > > > > > > list > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > KIP in the 515 slot, so we're all set there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the actual issues under discussion, I think > there are > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > things we should clarify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) It is possible to use TLS connectivity to Zookeeper > from Apache > > > > > > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > > > > > 2.4 -- the problem is that configuration information > has to be > > > > > > > passed > > > > > > > > > via > > > > > > > > > > > system properties as "-D" command line options on the > java > > > > > > > invocation > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > the broker, and those are not secure (anyone with > access to the box > > > > > > > > > can see > > > > > > > > > > > the command line used to invoke the broker); the > configuration > > > > > > > includes > > > > > > > > > > > sensitive information (e.g. a keystore password), so > we need a > > > > > > > secure > > > > > > > > > > > mechanism for passing the configuration values. I > believe the real > > > > > > > > > > > motivation for this KIP is to harden the configuration > mechanism > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > Zookeeper TLS connectivity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) I believe the list of CLI tools that continue to > use direct > > > > > > > > > Zookeeper > > > > > > > > > > > connectivity in a non-deprecated fashion is: > > > > > > > > > > > a) > > > > > > > zookeeper-security-migration.sh/kafka.admin.ZkSecurityMigrator > > > > > > > > > > > b) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kafka-reassign-partitions.{sh,bat}/kafka.admin.ReassignPartitionsCommand > > > > > > > > > > > c) kafka-configs.{sh, bat}/kafka.admin.ConfigCommand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) I believe Kafka.admin.ConfigCommand presents a > conundrum > > > > > > > because it > > > > > > > > > > > explicitly states in a comment that a supported use > case is > > > > > > > > > bootstrapping a > > > > > > > > > > > Kafka cluster with encrypted passwords in Zookeeper > (see > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/ConfigCommand.scala#L65 > > > > > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > > This means it will be especially difficult to > deprecate this > > > > > > > particular > > > > > > > > > > > direct Zookeeper connectivity without a different > storage > > > > > > > mechanism for > > > > > > > > > > > dynamic configuration values being available (i.e. the > self-managed > > > > > > > > > quorum > > > > > > > > > > > referred to in KIP-500). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it would be easier and simpler to harden the > Zookeeper TLS > > > > > > > > > > > configuration in both Kafka and in CLI tools compared > to trying to > > > > > > > > > > > deprecate the direct Zookeeper connectivity in the > above 3 CLI > > > > > > > tools -- > > > > > > > > > > > especially when ConfigCommand has no obvious > short-term path to > > > > > > > > > deprecation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding how to harden the TLS configuration, adding > the > > > > > > > appropriate > > > > > > > > > > > configs to Kafka is an obvious choice for the > brokers. Not that > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > > > values cannot be dynamically reconfigurable because > the values > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > required to connect to Zookeeper via TLS in the first > place. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding how to harden the TLS configuration for the > 3 remaining > > > > > > > CLI > > > > > > > > > > > tools, it would be relatively straightforward to add > support for a > > > > > > > > > > > "--zk-tls-config-file <String: Zookeeper TLS > configuration system > > > > > > > > > > > properties file path>" option to each one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:13 AM Pere Urbón Bayes < > > > > > > > pere.ur...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> True, the number is duplicated. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> do you know how can we get the problem fix? I was > not aware, I > > > > > > > > > missed, > > > > > > > > > > >> sorry the need to add the KIP to the table. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- Pere > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Missatge de Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < > > > > > > > quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > del > > > > > > > > > > >> dia > > > > > > > > > > >> dt., 3 de set. 2019 a les 13:43: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Pere, > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Have you add your KIP to the list here > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals > > > > > > > > > > >> ? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > I found the KIP number assigned to another. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:23 PM Pere Urbón Bayes < > > > > > > > > > pere.ur...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Thanks for your time Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> anyone else with comments? looking forward to > hearing from > > > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Stupid question: when do you move from discussion > to vote? > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Missatge de Harsha Chintalapani <ka...@harsha.io> > del dia > > > > > > > dv., 30 > > > > > > > > > > >> d’ag. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 2019 a les 21:59: > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks Pere. KIP looks good to me. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > -Harsha > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:05 AM, Pere Urbón > Bayes < > > > > > > > > > > >> >> pere.ur...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Not really, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> my idea is to keep the JAAS parameter, so > people don't see > > > > > > > > > major > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> changes. But if you pass a properties file, > then this takes > > > > > > > > > > >> precedence > > > > > > > > > > >> >> over > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> the other, with the idea that you can do sasl > as well with > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >> >> properties > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> files. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Makes sense? > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> -- Pere > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Missatge de Harsha Chintalapani < > ka...@harsha.io> del dia > > > > > > > dv., > > > > > > > > > 30 > > > > > > > > > > >> >> d’ag. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> 2019 a les 19:00: > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> Hi Pere, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> Thanks for the KIP. Enabling SSL for > zookeeper > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > > > > >> >> makes > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> sense. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> "The changes are planned to be introduced in a > compatible > > > > > > > way, > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> keeping the current JAAS variable precedence." > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> Can you elaborate a bit here. If the user > configures a JAAS > > > > > > > > > file > > > > > > > > > > >> with > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> Client section it will take precedence over > zookeeper SSL > > > > > > > > > configs? > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> Harsha > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 7:50 AM, Pere Urbón > Bayes < > > > > > > > > > > >> >> pere.ur...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Hi, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> quick question, I saw in another mail that > 2.4 release is > > > > > > > > > planned > > > > > > > > > > >> for > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> September. I think it would be really awesome > to have > > > > > > > this for > > > > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> release, do you think we can make it? > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> -- Pere > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Missatge de Pere Urbón Bayes < > pere.ur...@gmail.com> del > > > > > > > dia > > > > > > > > > dj., > > > > > > > > > > >> 29 > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> d’ag. 2019 a les 20:10: > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Hi, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> this is my first KIP for a change in Apache > Kafka, so I'm > > > > > > > > > really > > > > > > > > > > >> need > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> to the process. Looking forward to hearing > from you and > > > > > > > learn > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >> >> best > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> ropes here. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> I would like to propose this KIP-515 to > enable the > > > > > > > > > > >> ZookeeperClients > > > > > > > > > > >> >> to > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> take full advantage of the TLS communication > in the new > > > > > > > > > Zookeeper > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 3.5.5. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Specially interesting it the Zookeeper > Security Migration, > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > >> >> without > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> this change will not work with TLS, disabling > users to use > > > > > > > > > ACLs > > > > > > > > > > >> when > > > > > > > > > > >> >> the > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Zookeeper cluster use TLS. > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> link: > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-515%3A+Enable+ZK+client+to+use+the+new+TLS+supported+authentication > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Looking forward to hearing from you on this, > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> /cheers > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> -- > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Pere Urbon-Bayes > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Software Architect > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> http://www.purbon.com > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/purbon > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/purbon/ > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> -- > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Pere Urbon-Bayes > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> Software Architect > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> http://www.purbon.com > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/purbon > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/purbon/ > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> -- > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Pere Urbon-Bayes > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Software Architect > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> http://www.purbon.com > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> https://twitter.com/purbon > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/purbon/ > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Pere Urbon-Bayes > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Software Architect > > > > > > > > > > >> >> http://www.purbon.com > > > > > > > > > > >> >> https://twitter.com/purbon > > > > > > > > > > >> >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/purbon/ > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > >> Pere Urbon-Bayes > > > > > > > > > > >> Software Architect > > > > > > > > > > >> http://www.purbon.com > > > > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/purbon > > > > > > > > > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/purbon/ > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
