Thanks, +1 On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 1:06 PM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi Jason, > > Thanks for your feedback. You have brought a good point. I did not consider > this but your are right. It makes sense to add it as well in order to able > to fully > parse the SyncGroup request/response. Let me update the KIP. > > Thanks, > David > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:52 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > Just one question. In addition to including the protocol type, I'm > > wondering if there is value in adding the protocol name to SyncGroup? > This > > would potentially give you the ability to parse the "user data" field in > > the consumer group schema. > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:35 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-559: Make the Kafka Protocol > > Friendlier > > > with L7 Proxies. > > > > > > The KIP is here: > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-559%3A+Make+the+Kafka+Protocol+Friendlier+with+L7+Proxies > > > > > > Thanks, > > > David > > > > > >
