Hi all, Apologies for the back and forth on this issue, but while implementing the new API I've come around to thinking we should not return anything after all, and just leave it up to the user to determine if they need to retry the rebalance.
Since I was the main (only) strong proponent of this aspect, I'm assuming this will be fine with everyone -- but please do raise any concerns/questions if you have them. Thanks! Sophie On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:26 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks all! > > This KIP passes with 3 binding votes (John, Bill, and Guozhang) and > 3 non-binding votes (Navinder, Konstantine, Boyang, and Bruno). > > I'll call for review on a PR shortly. > > Sophie > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:25 AM Bruno Cadonna <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Best, >> Bruno >> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 1:57 AM Boyang Chen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:45 PM Guozhang Wang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (binding). >> > > >> > > >> > > Guozhang >> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:29 PM Guozhang Wang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Sophie, >> > > > >> > > > Thanks for the KIP, I left some comments on the DISCUSS thread. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Guozhang >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 3:25 PM Bill Bejeck <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Thanks for the KIP Sophie. >> > > >> >> > > >> It's a +1 (binding) for me. >> > > >> >> > > >> -Bill >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:21 PM Konstantine Karantasis < >> > > >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > The KIP reads quite well for me now and I think this feature will >> > > enable >> > > >> > even more efficient load balancing for specific use cases. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I'm also +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > >> > > >> > - Konstantine >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:35 AM Navinder Brar >> > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Thanks Sophie, much required. >> > > >> > > +1 non-binding. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 10:33 PM, John Roesler < >> > > >> > [email protected]> >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Sophie, >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I'm +1 (binding) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -John >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020, at 20:54, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hey all, >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > I'd like to start the voting on KIP-568. It proposes the new >> > > >> > > > Consumer#enforceRebalance API to facilitate triggering >> efficient >> > > >> > > rebalances. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > For reference, here is the KIP link again: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-568%3A+Explicit+rebalance+triggering+on+the+Consumer >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Thanks! >> > > >> > > > Sophie >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > -- Guozhang >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > -- Guozhang >> > > >> >
