How reasonable of it. Let's try this again: Streams Logo option 2 <https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1WoWn0kF3E7dbL1FGYT8_-bIeT2IjfYORAm6gg8Ils4k/edit?usp=sharing>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:34 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sophie, > > I cannot find the attachment from your previous email --- in fact, ASF > mailing list usually blocks all attachments for security reasons. If you > can share a link to the image (google drawings etc) in your email that > would be great. > > Guozhang > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:02 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> Just to throw another proposal out there and inspire some debate, here's >> a similar-but-different >> idea (inspired by John + some sketches I found on google): >> >> *~~ See attachment, inlined image is too large for the mailing list ~~* >> >> This one's definitely more fun, my only concern is that it doesn't really >> scale well. At the lower end >> of sizes the otters will be pretty difficult to see; and I had to stretch >> out the Kafka circles even at >> the larger end just to fit them through. >> >> But maybe with a cleaner drawing and some color it'll still look good and >> be recognizable + distinct >> enough when small. >> >> Any thoughts? Any binding and/or non-binding votes? >> >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 1:00 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >> >>> Seems the mailing list may have filtered the inlined prototype logo, >>> attaching it here instead >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:54 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Matthias makes a good point about being careful not to position Streams >>>> as >>>> outside of Apache Kafka. One obvious thing we could do it just include >>>> the >>>> Kafka logo as-is in the Streams logo, somehow. >>>> >>>> I have some unqualified opinions on what that might look like: >>>> A good logo is simple and clean, so incorporating the Kafka logo as a >>>> minor >>>> detail within a more complicated image is probably not the best way to >>>> get >>>> the quick and easy comprehension/recognition that we're going for. >>>> >>>> That said I'd throw out the idea of just attaching something to the >>>> Kafka logo, >>>> perhaps a stream-dwelling animal, perhaps a (river) otter? It could be >>>> "swimming" left of the Kafka logo, with its head touching the upper >>>> circle and >>>> its tail touching the bottom one. Like Streams, it starts with Kafka >>>> and ends >>>> with Kafka (ie reading input topics and writing to output topics). >>>> >>>> Without further ado, here's my very rough prototype for the Kafka >>>> Streams logo: >>>> >>>> [image: image.png] >>>> Obviously the real thing would be colored and presumably done by someone >>>> with actual artist talent/experience (or at least photoshop ability). >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 1:08 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> Hash: SHA512 >>>>> >>>>> Boyang, >>>>> >>>>> thanks for starting this discussion. I like the idea in general >>>>> however we need to be a little careful IMHO -- as you mentioned Kafka >>>>> is one project and thus we should avoid the impression that Kafka >>>>> Streams is not part of Apache Kafka. >>>>> >>>>> Besides this, many projects use animals that are often very adorable. >>>>> Maybe we could find a cute Streams related mascot? :) >>>>> >>>>> I would love to hear opinions especially from the PMC if having a logo >>>>> for Kafka Streams is a viable thing to do. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> On 3/3/20 1:01 AM, Patrik Kleindl wrote: >>>>> > Hi Boyang Great idea, that would help in some discussions. To throw >>>>> > in a first idea: https://imgur.com/a/UowXaMk best regards Patrik >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 18:23, Boyang Chen >>>>> > <reluctanthero...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Hey Apache Kafka committers and community folks, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> over the years Kafka Streams has been widely adopted and tons of >>>>> >> blog posts and tech talks have been trying to introduce it to >>>>> >> people with need of stream processing. As it is part of Apache >>>>> >> Kafka project, there is always an awkward situation where Kafka >>>>> >> Streams could not be campaigned as a standalone streaming engine, >>>>> >> and makes people confused about its relation to Kafka. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> So, do we want to introduce a customized logo just for Streams? >>>>> >> The immediate benefit is when people are making technical >>>>> >> decisions, we could list Streams as a logo just like Flink and >>>>> >> Spark Streaming, instead of putting Kafka logo there as it is not >>>>> >> literally a legitimate comparison between processing framework >>>>> >> and messaging system. Should we do a KIP for this? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Boyang >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>>> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEI8mthP+5zxXZZdDSO4miYXKq/OgFAl5kDVQACgkQO4miYXKq >>>>> /Og2Hg/+IOjjz3yrvHOz/p/Qbi9hXDK+GZT6Ixzk2HrrpMiLAAZs6WrNGQMwwI6a >>>>> qrPdMRLKA45F53wwMXBqhLYe0O0vOIRSur3pef8UuTVEkbFstY6dNzduPjTXK4vV >>>>> Ahzb+pu1lZsF+n2DbMuXWvkmvMAsSrKQXbH58rA7I4qx7Zr6g1a/KL2b2oOoo3kI >>>>> 4x3PJfG6oLSnQHwkJxmM79ZjM7MLZh0d8cRqb7Oudy5MJiMzHY+Rm5aTu4nhPgRr >>>>> cLxA8kz1PbGPboxjD9/ZGuZJMWfVnvY1wJcOp5UnOUs4kX5uYDyWw1sKIn3DcnW8 >>>>> YVzoto0syCHTAdbl89H2fxhJbtVp8JSxbBx9AW8mdgLOLsYRZGHZ1cbdJ3h4NkeE >>>>> xTPTuTptQbhdcjbSVX6F0q+h1hiPCU5PKqcR12zGVTBI4rOGkhPIhDdnIti5Qp2e >>>>> MQ1Urh/tWCfwiJZbOyjZ9Tz/2vbUBB4kzUI9DxwWpD15jgMuN3JfqFwcwSIm7NrY >>>>> jHcM3UB2QlUt+uymU78xjy6er2AFiGrfL7UXeFHzzVIWBU3fdw4wqpuIuWjFhL3t >>>>> NWnAvamXOc7kfE4VXQ8igoRUVDZ8xCCqNvVoaJZ1cWboY/Cfk+4sgd9QnDMZN9jU >>>>> bzRpghQp3R93Vp5FH4L9z478uuh8DFM2/+6pqqapd9efydGtKrU= >>>>> =OFBs >>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>> > > -- > -- Guozhang >
