HI all

The summary of the vote: *Total 6 +ve* with *+4 Binding*, +2 non-Binding.
I'll move the KIP to Accepted state.

Thanks
Maulin

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:32 PM Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Rajini and Jun. I'll update the shouldBeRebuilt() docs on what
> happens to existing SSL Connections.
>
> Thanks everybody who participated in the discussion thread and voting
> thread and spending the valuable time reviewing the KIP/PR. Could not have
> done it without your support. Really appreciate it.
>
> Now we can close on the voting phase since we had it open for > 72 hrs but
> since this is my first KIP, can you please guide what happens now? Can I
> move the KIP to accepted state myself?
>
> Thanks
> Maulin
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:27 AM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Rajini, Maulin,
>>
>> 1. Ok. Then we can keep the package name as it is.
>>
>> 2. Thanks for updating the javadoc for shouldBeRebuilt(). Could you also
>> clarify after the SslEngine is rebuilt, what happens to existing SSL
>> connections?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:07 AM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jun, Maulin,
>> >
>> >  org.apache.kafka.common.security.ssl contains internal classes like
>> > SslFactory.  org.apache.kafka.common.security.auth is a public package
>> > which contains all our current authentication-related classes. If we
>> want
>> > to move the new interface into an SSL-specific package, we should
>> perhaps
>> > create a new public package rather than use an existing internal one?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:56 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 (binding).
>> > > Thanks for the KIP.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Manikumar
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:24 AM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > So far we got 3 Binding votes. I am planning to keep the voting
>> phase
>> > > open
>> > > > until Tuesday 10 PM Pacific Time which will be more than 72 hours
>> from
>> > > the
>> > > > first binding vote on Thursday 12:36 PM Pacific Time.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks
>> > > > Maulin
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:32 PM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I updated the Javadoc in the KIP details and the actual
>> > > SslEngineFactory
>> > > > > interface for shouldBeRebuilt(). For the first comment, probably
>> I'll
>> > > try
>> > > > > to address it tomorrow.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > Maulin
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:44 PM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Thanks Jun Rao for your vote and comments.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> For 1) Earlier it was the security.ssl package but after a
>> review I
>> > > > >> changed it to .auth since there are some public interfaces in
>> that
>> > > > package.
>> > > > >> I am open to move it under .ssl package.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> For 2) Sure. Will document in Javadocs for the method.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thanks
>> > > > >> Maulin
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:46 PM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Hi, Maulin,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me. Just a couple of minor comments
>> > > below.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> 1. Should the package name of the new
>> > > > >>> interface SslEngineFactory be
>> org.apache.kafka.common.security.ssl
>> > > > >>> instead
>> > > > >>> of org.apache.kafka.common.security.auth?
>> > > > >>> 2. Could you document when shouldBeRebuilt() will be called?
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Jun
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:07 PM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > >>> maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > ^^^  bump ^^^ The vote is open for 2-3 days and gotten 1
>> Binding
>> > > vote
>> > > > >>> so
>> > > > >>> > far, can you please vote so that we can try to move forward
>> with
>> > > > >>> changes?
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:11 PM Zhou, Thomas
>> > > > <thz...@paypal.com.invalid
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > wrote:
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > Regards,
>> > > > >>> > > Thomas
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > On 3/26/20, 12:36 PM, "Rajini Sivaram" <
>> > rajinisiva...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >     +1 (binding)
>> > > > >>> > >     Thanks for the KIP, Maulin!
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >     Regards,
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >     Rajini
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >     On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:14 PM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > >>> > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>> > >     wrote:
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >     > FYI - we have updated the KIP documentation also with
>> > > > >>> appropriate
>> > > > >>> > > code
>> > > > >>> > >     > samples for interfaces and few important changes.
>> > > > >>> > >     >
>> > > > >>> > >     > Thanks
>> > > > >>> > >     > Maulin
>> > > > >>> > >     >
>> > > > >>> > >     > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:21 AM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > >>> > >     > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>> > >     > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > >     >
>> > > > >>> > >     > > bump
>> > > > >>> > >     > >
>> > > > >>> > >     > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:20 AM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > >>> > >     > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>> > >     > >
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> Hi all
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> After much await on the approach conclusion we
>> have a
>> > PR
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fkafka%2Fpull%2F8338&amp;data=01%7C01%7Cthzhou%40paypal.com%7C4520b56f3b1f44cceddb08d7d1bd052a%7Cfb00791460204374977e21bac5f3f4c8%7C1&amp;sdata=1ydk0OMaucb8QhTyyQ8Ua3ereGzcS4usRlavU1RixkE%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> > > > >>> > > .
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> Can you please provide your vote so that we can
>> more
>> > > this
>> > > > >>> > forward?
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> Thanks
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> Maulin
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:03 PM Maulin Vasavada <
>> > > > >>> > >     > >> maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> Hi all
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> After a good discussion on the KIP at
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Fdev%40kafka.apache.org%2Fmsg101011.html&amp;data=01%7C01%7Cthzhou%40paypal.com%7C4520b56f3b1f44cceddb08d7d1bd052a%7Cfb00791460204374977e21bac5f3f4c8%7C1&amp;sdata=qsvbqkoxL6NSPDV6rm9B9xqZG5xvYaZkj0cYrTM6bPw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> > > > >>> > > I
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> think we are ready to start voting.
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> KIP:
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >     >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fpages%2Fviewpage.action%3FpageId%3D128650952&amp;data=01%7C01%7Cthzhou%40paypal.com%7C4520b56f3b1f44cceddb08d7d1bd052a%7Cfb00791460204374977e21bac5f3f4c8%7C1&amp;sdata=rcqWc2inIbrWlMj2jssHPKcMlHuDuLvicmYHHDYWrF8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> The KIP proposes - Making SSLEngine creation
>> > pluggable
>> > > to
>> > > > >>> > support
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> customization of various security related aspects.
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> Thanks
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>> Maulin
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>>
>> > > > >>> > >     > >>
>> > > > >>> > >     >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to