On Tue, May 19, 2020, at 09:31, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> 
> Looks good. I just had one question. It sounds like your intent is to
> change kafka-configs.sh so that the --zookeeper flag is only supported for
> bootstrapping. I assume in the case of SCRAM that we will only make this
> change after the broker API is available?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason

Hi Jason,

Yes, that's correct.  We will have the SCRAM API ready by the Kafka 3.0 release.

best,
Colin


> 
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:22 AM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thanks Colin
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:57 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:29 PM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:41 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Colin!
> > > > >
> > > > > Guozhang
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:45 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-604: Remove ZooKeeper Flags from
> > the
> > > > > > Administrative Tools.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As a reminder, this KIP is for the next major release of Kafka,
> > the 3.0
> > > > > > release.   So it won't go into the upcoming 2.6 release.  It's a
> > pretty
> > > > > > small change that just removes the --zookeeper flags from some
> > tools
> > > > and
> > > > > > removes a deprecated tool.  We haven't decided exactly when we'll
> > do
> > > > 3.0
> > > > > > but I believe we will certainly want this change in that release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The KIP does contain one small change relevant to Kafka 2.6: adding
> > > > > > support for --if-exists and --if-not-exists in combination with the
> > > > > > --bootstrap-server flag.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > best,
> > > > > > Colin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to