> I think the KIP is quite straightforward and you could even skip the > DISCUSS and call for a VOTE directly.
Copy that On 2020/06/04 23:43:12, "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > Btw: > > I think the KIP is quite straightforward and you could even skip the > DISCUSS and call for a VOTE directly. > > > -Matthias > > On 6/4/20 4:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > @Chia-Ping > > > > Can you maybe start a new DISCUSS thread using the new KIP number? This > > would help to keep the threads separated. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > On 6/3/20 6:56 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > >> When I created the KIP, the next number was 619 and not sure why the > >> number is out of sync. > >> > >> At any rate, I will update the KIP number :_ > >> > >> On 2020/06/03 05:06:39, Cheng Tan <c...@confluent.io> wrote: > >>> Hi Chia, > >>> > >>> Hope you are doing well. I already took KIP-619 as my KIP identification > >>> number. Could you change your KIP id? Thank you. > >>> > >>> Best, - Cheng > >>> > >>>> On May 31, 2020, at 8:08 PM, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> hi All, > >>>> > >>>> This KIP plans to deprecate two unused methods without replacement. > >>>> > >>>> All suggestions are welcome! > >>>> > >>>> KIP: > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=155749118 > >>>> ISSUE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10044 > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> Chia-Ping > >>> > >>> > > > >
