Thanks for the KIP, Colin. The new RPCs look good to me, just one question:
since we don't return the password info through the RPC, how will brokers
load this info? (I'm presuming that they need it to configure
authentication)

-David

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:57 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, at 10:55, Boyang Chen wrote:
> > Hey Colin, thanks for the KIP. One question I have about AlterScramUsers
> > RPC is whether we could consolidate the deletion list and alteration
> list,
> > since in response we only have a single list of results. The further
> > benefit is to reduce unintentional duplicate entries for both deletion
> and
> > alteration, which makes the broker side handling logic easier. Another
> > alternative is to add DeleteScramUsers RPC to align what we currently
> have
> > with other user provided data such as delegation tokens (create, change,
> > delete).
> >
>
> Hi Boyang,
>
> It can't really be consolidated without some awkwardness.  It's probably
> better just to create a DeleteScramUsers function and RPC.  I've changed
> the KIP.
>
> >
> > For my own education, the salt will be automatically generated by the
> admin
> > client when we send the SCRAM requests correct?
> >
>
> Yes, the client generates the salt before sending the request.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> > Best,
> > Boyang
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:10 AM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP, Colin!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:49 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-554: Add a broker-side SCRAM
> > > configuration
> > > > API.  The KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ihERCQ
> > > >
> > > > The previous discussion thread is here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r69bdc65bdf58f5576944a551ff249d759073ecbf5daa441cff680ab0%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > > best,
> > > > Colin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
David Arthur

Reply via email to