Thanks for the very precise time John :D

I think that time has been passed so I am going to close the voting.

Thanks!
Sagar.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:28 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Sagar,
>
> It does have three binding votes, but it looks like it's a
> little shy of the mandatory 72 hours you have to leave the
> vote open:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals#KafkaImprovementProposals-Process
>
> Assuming no one shows up with a veto, you can close the vote
> after 2021/04/09 02:12:47 UTC.
>
> That said, I've never seen a veto, so I think you're safe to
> start preparing the PR for reviews.
>
> Thanks again,
> John
>
>
> On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 00:22 +0530, Sagar wrote:
> > Thanks Sophie/ John/ Leah and Guozhang.
> >
> > Can I assume that this kip has received sufficient votes to be marked as
> > accepted ?
> >
> > Sagar.
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 9:38 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1. Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:01 AM Leah Thomas
> <ltho...@confluent.io.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Sagar, +1 non-binding. Thanks again for doing this.
> > > >
> > > > Leah
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 9:40 PM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Sagar!
> > > > >
> > > > > I’m +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > -John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, at 21:35, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) from me
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 7:13 PM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to start voting on the following KIP:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=177047930
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > Sagar.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -- Guozhang
> > >
>
>
>

Reply via email to