[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jason Gustafson resolved KAFKA-13417.
-------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Dynamic thread pool re-configurations may not get processed
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-13417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13417
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>            Assignee: Jason Gustafson
>            Priority: Major
>
> `DynamicBrokerConfig.updateCurrentConfig` includes the following logic to 
> update the current configuration and to let each `Reconfigurable` process the 
> update:
> {code}
>     val oldConfig = currentConfig
>     val (newConfig, brokerReconfigurablesToUpdate) = 
> processReconfiguration(newProps, validateOnly = false)
>     if (newConfig ne currentConfig) {
>       currentConfig = newConfig
>       kafkaConfig.updateCurrentConfig(newConfig)
>       // Process BrokerReconfigurable updates after current config is updated
>       brokerReconfigurablesToUpdate.foreach(_.reconfigure(oldConfig, 
> newConfig))
>     }
> {code}
> The problem here is that `currentConfig` gets initialized as `kafkaConfig` 
> which means that the first call to 
> `kafkaConfig.updateCurrentConfig(newConfig)` ends up mutating `currentConfig` 
> and consequently `oldConfig`. The problem with this is that some of the 
> `reconfigure` implementations will only apply a new configuration if the 
> value in `oldConfig` does not match the value in `newConfig`. For example, 
> here is the logic to update thread pools dynamically:
> {code}
>   override def reconfigure(oldConfig: KafkaConfig, newConfig: KafkaConfig): 
> Unit = {
>     if (newConfig.numIoThreads != oldConfig.numIoThreads)
>       
> server.dataPlaneRequestHandlerPool.resizeThreadPool(newConfig.numIoThreads)
>     if (newConfig.numNetworkThreads != oldConfig.numNetworkThreads)
>       server.socketServer.resizeThreadPool(oldConfig.numNetworkThreads, 
> newConfig.numNetworkThreads)
>     if (newConfig.numReplicaFetchers != oldConfig.numReplicaFetchers)
>       
> server.replicaManager.replicaFetcherManager.resizeThreadPool(newConfig.numReplicaFetchers)
>     if (newConfig.numRecoveryThreadsPerDataDir != 
> oldConfig.numRecoveryThreadsPerDataDir)
>       
> server.logManager.resizeRecoveryThreadPool(newConfig.numRecoveryThreadsPerDataDir)
>     if (newConfig.backgroundThreads != oldConfig.backgroundThreads)
>       server.kafkaScheduler.resizeThreadPool(newConfig.backgroundThreads)
>   }
> {code}
> Because of this, the dynamic update will not get applied the first time it is 
> made. I believe subsequent updates would work correctly though because we 
> would have lost the indirect reference to `kafkaConfig`. Other than the 
> `DynamicThreadPool` configurations, it looks like the config to update 
> unclean leader election may also be affected by this bug.
> NOTE: This bug only affects kraft, which is missing the call to 
> `DynamicBrokerConfig.initialize()`. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to