Hi Guozhang, In short, what Riven wants to do, is that we keep the `pause` flag after rebalanced, while before this change, Rebalance does not preserve pause/resume state as described in KAFKA-2350 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2350>. In this case, do you think we can skip the KIP and move on the implementation?
I'm good if we need a KIP or not, just want to make it clear in case it breaks any existing expectation/behavior. Thank you. Luke On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:09 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Riven, > > > Thanks for bringing this proposal. As we discussed on the JIRA I'm > personally in favor of this fix. But if all the proposed changes are in > `ConsumerCoordinator`, then we do not need a KIP since that class is > internal only. > > > Guozhang > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:35 AM Riven Sun <riven....@zoom.us.invalid> > wrote: > > > Sorry, I sent this email via GMail. Refer to the contents of other > people's > > DISSCUSS emails. Mistakenly introduced someone else's KIP. > > > > The KIP related to this DISCUSS is > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=199534763 > > > > Thank you for your kindness > > RivenSun > > > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 5:32 PM Riven Sun <riven....@zoom.us> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Sorry, I sent this email via GMail. Refer to the contents of other > > >> people's DISSCUSS emails. Mistakenly introduced someone else's KIP. > > >> > > >> The KIP related to this DISCUSS is > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=199534763 > > >> > > >> Thank you for your kindness > > >> RivenSun > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
