Hi, thanks for the KIP.

+1

Just a minor note:

In the rejected alternatives I read "If B would like to lookup s, there are
two possible approaches to take", but then you describe only one.




On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 6:17 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP, Daan.
>
> I've caught up on the discussion thread and I've gone over the KIP.  This
> seems like a good addition to me.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 2:13 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On 4/1/22 6:47 AM, John Roesler wrote:
> > > Thanks for the KIP, Daan!
> > >
> > > I’m +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, at 06:01, Daan Gertis wrote:
> > >> I would like to start a vote on this one:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-813%3A+Shareable+State+Stores
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> D.
> >
>

Reply via email to