Viktor, seeing as it's been on trunk for a while and is a very small
change, it seems fine to include in this release. I just finished building
the RC, but haven't started a vote thread yet. Good timing on your part :)
I'll merge this PR shortly and start a new RC build.

-David

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:42 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
<viktor.somo...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Found an issue (tight loop in the consumer), fixed it on trunk and
> backported it onto the 3.2 branch. Is it possible to include this in the
> 3.2.1 release?
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12417
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:57 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Chris S and Chris E,
> >
> > Thanks for quickly working on and reviewing the
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14079 issue mentioned
> > above. The two PRs you created, one for the `trunk` branch and one for
> the
> > `3.2` branch, have both been merged, and the issue has been marked as
> > resolved.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Randall
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 5:44 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Chris E.
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the feedback earlier, I updated the PR based on your
> > > comments and also pushed a second PR for trunk for 3.3.0
> > >
> > > I agree the impact is high which is why I found the issue. I recently
> > > turned on this feature and suddenly my connect worker/task kept
> > > periodically falling over with OOM errors. Finally I took a heap dump
> and
> > > saw a ton of submitted record objects in memory and started
> investigating
> > > and that's how I figured out it was related to this new feature..
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 1:48 PM Chris Egerton <fearthecel...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Chris,
> > > >
> > > > Good find, and thanks for filing a fix. I agree that we should get
> this
> > > > into 3.2.1 if possible. The risk is fairly low (the functional parts
> of
> > > the
> > > > fix are just two lines long) and the impact of the bug is high for
> > users
> > > > who have configured source connectors with "errors.tolerance" set to
> > > "all".
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:26 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > > > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I found a memory leak that was introduced in 3.2.0 in a
> > > Connector
> > > > > SourceTask. I created a JIRA:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14079 and small PR
> with
> > a
> > > > fix:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12412
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this should be included in 3.2.1. It should also go into
> > 3.3.0
> > > > but
> > > > > there was a lot of refactoring done there with the source task code
> > due
> > > > to
> > > > > KIP-618 so another PR needs to be done for that if this is merged.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:06 AM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Here is the release plan for 3.2.1
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+3.2.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am working on getting clarity on the one open blocker. Once
> that
> > is
> > > > > > resolved (or rescheduled for a future release), I will build the
> > > first
> > > > > > release candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -David
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 3:10 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1, Thanks David!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 1:16 PM David Jacot <
> > david.ja...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1. Thanks David.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Le mer. 13 juil. 2022 à 23:43, José Armando García Sancio
> > > > > > > > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1. Thanks for volunteering David.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > -José
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > David Arthur
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
David Arthur

Reply via email to