Hi ShunKang, Yes, this vote can be concluded. You can start to implement it.
Thanks. Luke On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 9:45 PM ShunKang Lin <linshunkang....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thank you for the vote. I've got three +1 votes (Guozhang, Luke, Chris), > can this vote be concluded? > > Best, > ShunKang > > Chris Egerton <chr...@aiven.io.invalid> 于2022年10月12日周三 23:17写道： > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks ShunKang! > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:26 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 from me. > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > Luke > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:50 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1, thanks ShunKang. > > > > > > > > Though its proposed motivation is on consumer fetcher's > > deserialization, > > > I > > > > think adding an overloaded method with ByteBuffer would help with > other > > > > serde places on the client side as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:41 AM ShunKang Lin < > > linshunkang....@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-863, which proposes to reduce > > memory > > > > > allocation and memory copying in > Fetcher#parseRecord(TopicPartition, > > > > > RecordBatch, Record). > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=225152035 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to all who reviewed the proposal, and thanks in advance for > > > taking > > > > > the time to vote! > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > ShunKang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > >
