Hi Divij, I added this clarification and will start a vote soon.

Thanks.

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 5:24 PM Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for providing answers to my suggestions folks.
>
> Based on your answers, it seems like the KIP wants to do, relative duration
> = (now - timestamp), where "now" is in UTC (and not in your machine's
> locale/timezone). Perhaps, it's worth clarifying in the KIP?
> Other than that, no more comments from my side. The proposal looks good to
> me.
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 9:52 AM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Divij, thanks for having a look.
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:03 PM Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you for the KIP.
> > >
> > > The current proposal has the limitation that it uses a duration syntax
> > for
> > > representation of a timestamp. Also, the syntax relies on the locale and
> > > timezone of the caller machine. This makes it difficult to share the
> > output
> > > with others. As an example, let's say you want to share the state of the
> > > quorum with me which was captured but "3s ago" gives me no information on
> > > when it was executed.
> > >
> >
> > AFAIK, Unix timestamps are based on UTC, so there is no locale involved
> > here.
> >
> > > Alternatively, may I suggest introducing a parameter called
> > > "--datetime-format=" which takes as value the ISO-8601 [1] format and
> > > prints the timestamp based on the provided format. It would solve the
> > > problem of readability (epochs are hard to read!) as well as the problem
> > of
> > > portability of output across machines.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> >
> > This could be a further improvement, but my point is that it is more
> > important to show the delay since the last time the operation was
> > performed, rather than the exact date. In that sense I think it is
> > more readable. Happy to hear other opinions on this.
> >
> > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
> > >
> > > --
> > > Divij Vaidya
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 6:10 PM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all, I'd like to start a new discussion thread on KIP-927: Improve
> > > > the kafka-metadata-quorum output.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-927%3A+Improve+the+kafka-metadata-quorum+output
> > > >
> > > > This KIP is small and proposes to add a new optional flag to have a
> > > > human-readable timestamp output.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > Br
> > > > Fede
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to