Hi all,
I added the public enum `ResultOrder` to the KIP which helps with keeping
three values (unordered, ascending, and descending) for the query results.
Therefore the method `isAscending()` is changed to `resultOrder()` which
returns either the user specified result order or `unorderd`.
Cheers,
Alieh

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:40 PM Alieh Saeedi <asae...@confluent.io> wrote:

> Thank you, Guozhag and Bruno, for reviewing the KIP and reading the whole
> discussion thread. I appreciate your help:)
> The KIP is now corrected and updated.
>
> Cheers,
> Alieh
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:43 AM Bruno Cadonna <cado...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Alieh,
>>
>> I am +1 (binding).
>>
>> However, although we agreed on not specifying an order of the results by
>> default, there is still the following  sentence in the KIP:
>>
>> "The order of the returned records is by default ascending by timestamp.
>> The method withDescendingTimestamps() can reverse the order. Btw,
>> withAscendingTimestamps() method can be used for code readability
>> purpose. "
>>
>> Could you please change it and also fix what Guozhang commented?
>>
>> Best,
>> Bruno
>>
>> On 11/19/23 2:12 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>> > Thanks Alieh,
>> >
>> > I read through the wiki page and the DISCUSS thread, all LGTM except a
>> > minor thing in javadoc:
>> >
>> > "The query returns the records with a global ascending order of keys.
>> > The records with the same key are ordered based on their insertion
>> > timestamp in ascending order. Both the global and partial ordering are
>> > modifiable with the corresponding methods defined for the class."
>> >
>> > Since this KIP is only for a single key, there's no key ordering but
>> > only timestamp ordering right? Maybe the javadoc can be updated
>> > accordingly.
>> >
>> > Otherwise, LGTM.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 2:36 AM Alieh Saeedi
>> > <asae...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> Following my recent message in the discussion thread, I am opening the
>> >> voting for KIP-968. Thanks for your votes in advance.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Alieh
>>
>

Reply via email to