Thanks Chia.

I have updated KIP with this quote, in the migration plan section.

Thanks,
Murali

On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 3:30 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > Muralidhar Basani <muralidhar.bas...@aiven.io.invalid> 於 2024年9月15日
> 晚上9:02 寫道:
> >
> > With this, I think, users don't have to make any explicit changes in
> their
> > code, if their provider is reload4j. And if it's a different provider
> (like
> > logback, log4j), they would have to upgrade that to match it with slf4j.
>
> If upgrading the matched provider is the only explicit change and we
> expect users have responsibility to keep consistent version when using
> other providers , could we write it down to the KIP?
>
> That means we will update slf4j without KIP in the future except for
> specific reason.
>
> Best,
> Chia-Ping

Reply via email to