[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Colin McCabe resolved KAFKA-14312.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Based on the discussion, this behavior isn't unique to KRaft, and isn't a bug. 
If you want a different behavior for sequence numbers, consider filing a KIP.

> Kraft + ProducerStateManager: produce requests to new partitions with a 
> non-zero sequence number should be rejected
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-14312
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14312
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: kraft, producer 
>            Reporter: Travis Bischel
>            Priority: Major
>
> h1. Background
> In Kraft mode, if I create a topic, I am occasionally seeing MetadataResponse 
> with a valid leader, and if I immediately produce to that topic, I am seeing 
> NOT_LEADER_FOR_PARTITION. There may be another bug causing Kraft to return a 
> leader in metadata but reject requests to that leader, _but_ this is showing 
> a bigger problem.
> Kafka currently accepts produce requests to new partitions with a non-zero 
> sequence number. I have confirmed this locally by modifying my client to 
> start producing with a sequence number of 10. Producing three records 
> sequentially back to back (seq 10, 11, 12) are all successful. I _think_ this 
> [comment|https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/3e7eddecd6a63ea6a9793d3270bef6d0be5c9021/core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/ProducerStateManager.scala#L235-L236]
>  in the Kafka source also indicates roughly the same thing.
> h1. Problem
>  * Client initializes producer ID
>  * Client creates topic "foo" (for the problem, we will ignore partitions – 
> there is just one partition)
>  * Client sends produce request A with 5 records
>  * Client sends produce request B with 5 records before receiving a response 
> for A
>  * Broker returns NOT_LEADER_FOR_PARTITION to produce request A
>  * Broker finally initializes, becomes leader before seeing request B
>  * Broker accepts request B as the first request
>  * Broker believes sequence number 5 is ok, and is expecting the next 
> sequence to be 10
>  * Client retries requests A and B, because A failed
>  * Broker sees request A with sequence 0, returns OutOfOrderSequenceException
>  * Client enters a fatal state, because OOOSN is not retryable
> h1. Reproducing
> I can reliably reproduce this error using Kraft mode with 1 broker. I am 
> using the following docker compose:
> {{version: "3.7"}}
> {{services:}}
> {{  kafka:}}
> {{    image: bitnami/kafka:latest}}
> {{    network_mode: host}}
> {{    environment:}}
> {{      KAFKA_ENABLE_KRAFT: yes}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_PROCESS_ROLES: controller,broker}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_CONTROLLER_LISTENER_NAMES: CONTROLLER}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_LISTENERS: PLAINTEXT://:9092,CONTROLLER://:9093}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_LISTENER_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_MAP: 
> CONTROLLER:PLAINTEXT,PLAINTEXT:PLAINTEXT}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_CONTROLLER_QUORUM_VOTERS: 1@127.0.0.1:9093}}
> {{      # Set this to "PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9092" if you want to run this 
> container on localhost via Docker}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_ADVERTISED_LISTENERS: PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9092}}
> {{      KAFKA_CFG_BROKER_ID: 1}}
> {{      ALLOW_PLAINTEXT_LISTENER: yes}}
> {{      KAFKA_KRAFT_CLUSTER_ID: XkpGZQ27R3eTl3OdTm2LYA # 16 byte 
> base64-encoded UUID}}
> {{      BITNAMI_DEBUG: true # Enable this to get more info on startup 
> failures}}
>  
> I am running the franz-go integration tests to trigger this (frequently, but 
> not all of the time). However, these tests are not required. The behavior 
> described above can occasionally reproduce this.
> I have never experienced this against the zookeeper version. It seems that 
> the zk version always fully initializes a topic immediately and does not 
> return NOT_LEADER_FOR_PARTITION on the first produce request. This is a 
> separate problem – but the main problem described above exists in all 
> versions, and _can_ be experienced in zk in very strange circumstances.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to