Hi Chia-Ping,

Thanks for letting me know. Is it a regression in 4.0? If not, it does
not qualify as a blocker. That being said, if the fix is small and
merges before we cut the first RC, I am fine with merging it to 4.0
too.

Best,
David

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 1:11 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> hi David
>
> I have created KAFKA-18803 to address a bug. The fix is straightforward so we 
> can merge it soon.
>
> Best,
> Chia-Ping
>
> On 2025/02/13 21:55:23 Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > hi David
> >
> > I have opened KAFKA-18790 to address a flaky test that causes timeouts in 
> > the CI environment due to the AsyncConsumer getting stuck during testing. 
> > While this issue does not directly impact production code, it can 
> > significantly hinder our ability to run comprehensive tests for the 4.0.0 
> > release. Therefore, I plan to backport the fix to the 4.0.0 branch. The 
> > root cause of the flakiness has been identified and documented in the jira.
> >
> > Best,
> > Chia-Ping
> >
> > On 2025/02/11 11:07:14 David Jacot wrote:
> > > Hi Edoardo,
> > >
> > > As it is a small bugfix, feel free to cherry-pick it to 4.0.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > David
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:52 AM Edoardo Comar <edoardli...@gmail.com> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > > is it too late to cherry pick
> > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18833 on 4.0.0 ?
> > > > (KAFKA-18758: NullPointerException in shutdown following
> > > > InvalidConfigurationException)
> > > > it's a clean merges and build - but  should I wait for a 4.0.1 ?
> > > > thanks, Edo
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 18:45, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > hi David
> > > > >
> > > > > I open a new blocker 
> > > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18743) to remove a 
> > > > > zk-related config `leader.imbalance.per.broker.percentage` which is 
> > > > > used to limit the zk ops.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Chia-Ping
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2025/02/05 12:41:55 Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > > > > > hi David,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have a documentation improvement for the zk legacy code related 
> > > > > > to "<default>" (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18735). 
> > > > > > We initially assumed "<default>" would be removed in 4.0, but this 
> > > > > > has proven to be infeasible at this time. Therefore, it would be 
> > > > > > beneficial to update the existing documentation and comments to 
> > > > > > reflect the current reality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Chia-Ping
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2025/02/04 17:37:37 José Armando García Sancio wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi David,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks again for being the release manager for 4.0.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have this bug that I would like to include in 4.0.0:
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18723. I explained in 
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > comment that it is not a regression but it would be good to 
> > > > > > > include
> > > > > > > the fix if it makes the RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > -José
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to