After waiting the prescribed 72 hours, I would like to re-close this vote :)
The results are: * 7 binding +1 from Ismael, Bruno, Chia-Ping, Andrew, David J, Matthias, and Kamal * 2 non-binding +1 community votes from Ukpa and TengYao * No -1 votes *Now* the KIP is accepted. Thanks all, David On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 4:28 AM Kamal Chandraprakash < kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP! > > -- > Kamal > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:25 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 2/13/25 8:03 AM, David Arthur wrote: > > > Good point, Chris! The vote will remain open for another 2 days. I will > > > resend a vote summary if any additional votes are cast > > > > > > > > > David Arthur > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:27 Chris Egerton <fearthecel...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi David, > > >> > > >> Isn't it a requirement that we leave KIP vote threads open for a > > minimum of > > >> 72 hours before closing them? > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025, 10:16 David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Thanks for taking the time to vote on this KIP. Since we have the > > >> required > > >>> +1s, I'll go ahead and close the vote. > > >>> > > >>> The results are: > > >>> * 5 binding +1 from Ismael, Bruno, Chia-Ping, Andrew, and David J > > >>> * 2 non-binding +1 community votes from Ukpa and TengYao > > >>> * No -1 votes > > >>> > > >>> The KIP is now accepted. > > >>> > > >>> As mentioned in the thread above, only committer's votes are binding > > for > > >>> the adoption of a KIP. Community votes are not binding, but they are > > >>> encouraged and greatly appreciated! > > >>> > > >>> Thanks! > > >>> David A > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:07 AM David Jacot > > <dja...@confluent.io.invalid > > >>> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 (binding. Thanks for the KIP! > > >>>> > > >>>> DJ > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:57 AM Andrew Schofield < > > >>>> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 (binding) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks for the KIP. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Andrew > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ________________________________________ > > >>>>> From: TengYao Chi <kiting...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> Sent: 13 February 2025 09:38 > > >>>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org <dev@kafka.apache.org> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-1126: Serialize changes to Kafka with a > build > > >>>> queue > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi Ukpa > > >>>>> > > >>>>> FYI, your votes are not binding if you are not a committer for the > > >>> Apache > > >>>>> Kafka project. > > >>>>> Please see here > > >>>>> < > > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws#Bylaws-Voting > > > > > >>>>> for > > >>>>> more details. > > >>>>> You can vote with "+1 (non-binding)". > > >>>>> Although it doesn't have the same effect as a binding vote, > > >> expressing > > >>>> your > > >>>>> ideas by voting is still great. 😀 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best regards > > >>>>> TengYao > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> 於 2025年2月13日 週四 下午5:36寫道： > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> hi Uchechi > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks for your vote. As a reminder, the vote is assumed to be > > >>> binding > > >>>>>> only if it is from kafka committer. Your vote is definitely > > >> important > > >>>> to > > >>>>>> Kafka community, and I just try to explain the vote rule here. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>> Chia-Ping > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Ukpa Uchechi <ukpauchec...@gmail.com> 於 2025年2月13日 下午5:19 寫道： > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Uchechi > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> David Arthur > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- David Arthur
