Someone asked a detailed question about Kafka and I am guessing that it
was someone from this list. It looks like the email address got removed
before the person received the answer. Thank you for asking your
question which revealed a subtle bug in my code and I am now working on
a fix.
On 3/25/25 09:00, Glenn Engstrand wrote:
Not sure what that means Hamze. I indexed the code at commit
94a1bfb1281f06263976b1ba8bba8c5ac5d7f2ce from origin/trunk. I indexed
the documentation at about the same time (late January). Here is the
link to the web SPA. It asks for an email address to verify the
question and to receive the answer. It's okay with me if you just
wanted to use mailinator instead of your real email address.
https://www.exploravention.com/AskArchitect/
On 3/25/25 08:44, Hamze HAMZE wrote:
Hello Mr. Engstrand,
this sounds interesting. Does it reply with the configuration of the
current Apache Kafka architecture or does it explain the general
architecture?
Thanks in advance.
Am Di., 25. März 2025 um 16:42 Uhr schrieb Glenn Engstrand <
gl...@glennengstrand.info>:
I have been exploring how effective RAG-focused LLMs can be in
accurately answering questions concerning the software architecture of
various popular open source projects. Kafka is one of those projects.
With over a decade of experience as a software architect, I have formed
some opinions about what constitutes a good signal when analyzing large
amounts of code for this purpose. So, I wrote this web application that
allows you to ask these kinds of questions. You can ask about the
current architecture or about how to enhance that architecture to
accommodate new capabilities or to pay down specific forms of tech
debt.
It seems to me that the best way to measure accuracy would be for those
folks who work on Kafka to ask some questions and review the answers.
Would anyone here be willing to participating?
