Hi Stig,

Let's make sure we have consensus from the community for this backporting
first.
I've just replied in this thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/6k942pphowd28dh9gn6xbnngk6nxs3n0

Thanks.
Luke

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:

> We don't need a new ticket. We can just add `3.9.1` as fixed version
> after the PR is merged.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On 3/27/25 8:29 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing wrote:
> > I'd like to have https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19221 included if
> > possible. Do you need me to open a new ticket for the backport, separate
> > from the original for 4.0.0 at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17078?
> >
> > Den tors. 27. mar. 2025 kl. 03.03 skrev Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi Matthias,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your suggestion.
> >> The code freeze date will be *9 April 2025 *(Wednesday).
> >> I've also updated the release plan page.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> Luke
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 2:15 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Luke,
> >>>
> >>> Sounds like a good plan. I just added three more tickets that I would
> >>> like to include in the release.
> >>>
> >>> Can you give a more concrete date when you want to create the first RC?
> >>> Having a concrete date (even if if might shift a little bit), is
> usually
> >>> more helpful for people to plan getting bug fixes merged on time; "by
> >>> mid of April" might be a little bit too fuzzy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>> On 3/24/25 3:50 PM, Luke Chen wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll be the release manager for a bug fix release of the 3.9.1
> release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here you have the release plan for 3.9.1:
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+3.9.1
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm aiming to have the first release candidate *by the mid of April*
> >>> since
> >>>> there are still some opening issues in v3.9.1. Let me know if you have
> >>> any
> >>>> questions/concerns about the schedule.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>> Luke
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to