Hi, Jan, For me, the main gap of KIP-1150 is the support of all existing client APIs. Currently, there is no design for supporting APIs like transactions and queues.
Thanks, Jun On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 3:53 AM Jan Siekierski <jan.siekier...@kentra.io.invalid> wrote: > Would it be a good time to ask for the current status of this KIP? I > haven't seen much activity here for the past 2 months, the vote got vetoed > but I think the pending questions have been answered since then. KIP-1183 > (AutoMQ's proposal) also didn't have any activity since May. > > In my eyes KIP-1150 and KIP-1183 are two real choices that can be > made, with a coordinator-based approach being by far the dominant one when > it comes to market adoption - but all these are standalone products. > > I'm a big fan of both approaches, but would hate to see a stall. So the > question is: can we get an update? > > Maybe it's time to start another vote? Colin McCabe - have your questions > been answered? If not, is there anything I can do to help? I'm deeply > familiar with both architectures and have written about both? > > Kind regards, > Jan > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:42 AM Stanislav Kozlovski < > stanislavkozlov...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I have some nits - it may be useful to > > > > a) group all the KIP email threads in the main one (just a bunch of links > > to everything) > > b) create the email threads > > > > It's a bit hard to track it all - for example, I was searching for a > > discuss thread for KIP-1165 for a while; As far as I can tell, it doesn't > > exist yet. > > > > Since the KIPs are published (by virtue of having the root KIP be > > published, having a DISCUSS thread and links to sub-KIPs where were aimed > > to move the discussion towards), I think it would be good to create > DISCUSS > > threads for them all. > > > > Best, > > Stan > > > > On 2025/04/16 11:58:22 Josep Prat wrote: > > > Hi Kafka Devs! > > > > > > We want to start a new KIP discussion about introducing a new type of > > > topics that would make use of Object Storage as the primary source of > > > storage. However, as this KIP is big we decided to split it into > multiple > > > related KIPs. > > > We have the motivational KIP-1150 ( > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1150%3A+Diskless+Topics > > ) > > > that aims to discuss if Apache Kafka should aim to have this type of > > > feature at all. This KIP doesn't go onto details on how to implement > it. > > > This follows the same approach used when we discussed KRaft. > > > > > > But as we know that it is sometimes really hard to discuss on that meta > > > level, we also created several sub-kips (linked in KIP-1150) that offer > > an > > > implementation of this feature. > > > > > > We kindly ask you to use the proper DISCUSS threads for each type of > > > concern and keep this one to discuss whether Apache Kafka wants to have > > > this feature or not. > > > > > > Thanks in advance on behalf of all the authors of this KIP. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > Josep Prat > > > Open Source Engineering Director, Aiven > > > josep.p...@aiven.io | +491715557497 | aiven.io > > > Aiven Deutschland GmbH > > > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin > > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa, Hannu Valtonen, > > > Anna Richardson, Kenneth Chen > > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > > > > >
