Hi Chia-Ping,

 

Thanks for the feedback. The original configuration name was potentially 
ambiguous; 

it has therefore been renamed to `group.coordinator.append.max.buffer.size`.

 

chia_00:  

Update the vaild values of group.coordinator.append.max.buffer.size to be 

less than message.max.bytes.

 

chia_01: 

Yes, I agree. Make this config to be updated dynamically.

 

chia_02: 

I agree with you. Since the buffer behavior is a soft limit, this change should 

not impact any existing functionality or require special compatibility measures.

 

Best,

Lan




At 2025-08-18 00:54:15, "Chia-Ping Tsai" <chia7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>hi Lan
>
>chia_00:
>
>The `group.coordinator.append.max.bytes` must be smaller than the max
>message size; Otherwise, it could generate an invalid record
>
>chia_01:
>
>Since the max message size is a dynamic configuration, should we also make
>`group.coordinator.append.max.bytes` dynamic?
>
>chia_02:
>
>Is compatibility necessary? The max buffer of the new coordinator is
>currently transparent to users, so I don't think there are any users
>explicitly setting the max message size to control the buffer used by the
>new coordinator
>
>Best,
>Chia-Ping
>
>
>Lan Ding <isdin...@163.com> 於 2025年8月18日 週一 上午12:37寫道:
>
>> Hello everyone, I'd like to discuss a KIP regarding introducing a new
>> configuration,
>> group.coordinator.append.max.bytes Thank you! KIP link:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/hA5JFg Best, Lan Ding

Reply via email to