Hi, The KIP is accepted with - 3 +1 binding votes from Andrew, Arpoorv and Luke - 1 +1 non binding vote from Federico
Thanks everyone for the votes and feedback. Mickael On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:37 AM Luke Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > +1 (binding) from me. > > Thanks. > Luke > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 12:42 AM Apoorv Mittal <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Mickael, > > Thanks for the KIP, it seems right to add push interval details in the > > context and replace old interfaces. > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards, > > Apoorv Mittal > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 3:15 PM Andrew Schofield < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Mickael, > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Andrew > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Mickael Maison <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 29 September 2025 14:30 > > > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > Subject: [VOTE] KIP-1217: Include push interval in > > ClientTelemetryReceiver > > > context > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-1217: Include push interval in > > > ClientTelemetryReceiver context: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/6QnxFg > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mickael > > > > >
