Hi Nandini,

Thanks for the contribution.
I've taken a look at these PRs, and left comments.

Luke

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:59 PM jian fu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi  Nandini:
>
> Nice to meet you!
> I’m really amazed and impressed by how much you’ve accomplished. It’s great
> for me to have another teammate who’s also passionate about the tiered
> storage area— especially since only a few people are currently focusing on
> it.
>
> Regards
> Jian(jiafu1115)
>
> Nandini Singhal via dev <[email protected]> 于2025年12月8日周一 21:19写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > My name is Nandini, a software engineer at Datadog. We run Kafka at large
> > scale with tiered storage enabled, and I've been working on fixes and
> > improvements based on issues we've encountered in production. I recently
> > started contributing to Apache Kafka and wanted to introduce myself and
> > share the JIRAs I've opened:
> >
> >    1. KAFKA-19967 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19967> /
> PR
> >    <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/21102>
> >    2. KAFKA-19968 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19968> /
> PR
> >    <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/21108>
> >    3. KAFKA-19969 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19969> /
> PR
> >    <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/21090>
> >    4. KAFKA-19970 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19970> /
> PR
> >    <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/21089>
> >    5. KAFKA-19971 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19971> /
> PR
> >    <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/21088>
> >
> > These address issues we encountered running tiered storage in production
> -
> > quota enforcement not being honored correctly, GC pressure from large
> > remote reads, and gaps in observability metrics. I've included unit tests
> > and can share testing results if helpful. I'd appreciate any feedback or
> > reviews. Happy to provide more context, break down changes differently,
> or
> > jump on a call if that helps.
> >
> > Looking forward to contributing more to Kafka!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nandini
> >
>

Reply via email to