Hi Lucas, Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Sean On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:43 PM Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lucas, > Thanks for the KIP. It's a really nice fix to the protocol. > > +1 (binding) > > Andrew > > On 2026/01/26 15:10:55 David Jacot via dev wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > Thanks for the KIP! This is a great improvement. +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > David > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:58 AM Lucas Brutschy via dev < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote for the KIP: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1251%3A+Assignment+epochs+for+consumer+groups > > > > > > The high-level summary is the proposal to add assignment epochs to > > > KIP-848-style consumer groups. The idea is to avoid failing offset > > > commits in the new consumer protocol by relaxing the member epoch > > > validation slightly. > > > > > > The KIP will completely eliminate the transient STALE_MEMBER_EPOCH > > > that we observe during rebalances with the new protocol. So it will > > > also improve the protocol's efficiency during rebalances. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Lucas > > > > > >
