Bumping this thread. Can anybody help to take a look？ Thanks jian fu <[email protected]>于2026年2月26日 周四18:01写道：
> Bumping this thread. It needs 1 more vote. > > jian fu <[email protected]> 于2026年2月16日周一 08:24写道： > >> Hi Chia-Ping, >> >> Thanks for your comments. >> The proposed configuration change adds more flexibility while preserving >> the original behavior, and two others also agreed with it. So I’ve adopted >> the suggestion and updated the KIP and PR accordingly. >> Really appreciate your input! >> >> Hi all, >> The new comments have been addressed. >> Could someone please take another look at this KIP and vote if no further >> issues are found? We just need one vote now to move this forward . >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Regards, >> Jian >> >> Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> 于2026年2月5日周四 03:08写道： >> >>> hi Jian >>> >>> Sorry for the late reply. I raised a major comment here: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tr0khlvvpstqbqz3fs1xod0hzc9sf66p >>> >>> please take a look, thanks >>> >>> On 2026/01/12 13:12:13 jian fu wrote: >>> > Hi all: >>> > >>> > I would like to start a vote for the KIP: >>> > >>> > The KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/A4LMFw >>> > The Draft PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20913 >>> > >>> > Summary: >>> > >>> > Currently, Kafka's tiered storage implementation uploads all non-active >>> > local log segments to remote storage immediately, even when they are >>> still >>> > within the local retention period. >>> > This results in redundant storage of the same data in both local and >>> remote >>> > which don't have real value in some cases. >>> > This KIP's goal is to reduce the remote storage as an optional topic >>> > feature which can be implemented with few code lines. >>> > >>> > Thanks. >>> > Jian >>> > >>> >>
