Hi, Thanks for the reply. On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, 02:58 Levani Kokhreidze, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sushant, > > Thanks for the comments. > > RE sm01: > I haven’t researched the share groups support as I wasn’t sure if it would > be even useful for the share groups to support this feature. > But usefulness of this feature was mostly discussed around the new > consumer group protocol and streams protocol [1]. > Share groups support can be a followup KIP as well. > > RE sm02: > For the new consumer group protocol we will be utilising the heartbeat API > to update the assignment based on the paused partitions state. > As for heartbeat API for the classic group, I do not think it gives any > hint around target assignment, that will be still up to the client side > assignor to handle. > Since classic groups will eventually be deprecated, I believe it makes > more sense to focus on the new consumer group protocol. > > I hope this answers your questions. > > Thanks, > Levani > > [1] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/d45hpm86fxvc6f81svmzjo8hp8sjft5y > > > On 6. Mar 2026, at 13:38, Sushant Mahajan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Levani, > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > sm01: Is there any reason for not including share groups as supported > group > > types? > > > > sm02: Can heartbeat API be leveraged to inform the consumers about the > > paused partitions? That can extend to all group types and prevent future > > fetch calls. > > > > Regards, > > Sushant Mahajan > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026, 19:38 Sean Quah via dev, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Levani, > >> > >> Thank you for the KIP! > >> > >> sq01: Could you outline how the admin client will reset offsets for an > >> active group? After pausing a partition, we have to wait until the > >> partition has been released by its consumer. Will we poll DescribeGroup > or > >> retry OffsetCommits until it succeeds or do something else? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sean > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 8:53 PM Levani Kokhreidze < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I’d like to start discussion on KIP-1249 [1] which aims to provide a > >>> better offset reset functionality for the new consumer group rebalance > >>> protocols. > >>> > >>> Looking forward to hear community’s thoughts on this. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Levani > >>> > >>> [1] - > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1249%3A+Better+offset+reset+for+the+new+consumer+group+rebalance+protocol > >>> > >>> > >> > >
