Hi Jiunn-Yang, I fed your KIP to a well known ai tool and it generated a neat implementation (a little verbose on tests for my liking) https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/454a7f74e3b1cd8c7fbfc6e0e21fe9001f3ce2df
I think you could go for a vote on your KIP. Edo On Thu, 14 May 2026 at 10:16, Edoardo Comar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jiunn-Yang, > Thanks for the KIP. > I agree with the motivation and am happy with the proposal > > cheers, > Edoardo > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 14:07, 黃竣陽 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to start a discussion on KIP-1299 Use key range in > > ProducerPerformance > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/XpQ8G> > > > > This proposal aims to add configurable key distribution support to > > kafka-producer-perf-test. > > Currently, the tool always produces records with null keys, which does not > > reflect real-world > > keyed workloads. This KIP introduces two new arguments — --key-distribution > > and --message-key-range > > — enabling engineers to benchmark with round-robin or random key strategies > > over a bounded > > key space, providing more realistic performance measurements. > > > > Best regards, > > Jiunn-Yang
