Hi all, I’d like to manually bump this thread.
Best Regards, Jiunn-Yang > 黃竣陽 <[email protected]> 於 2026年5月15日 晚上8:57 寫道： > > Hi Ryan, > > Thanks for your feedback. I’ll reply in the discussion thread. > > Best Regards, > Jiunn-Yang > >> Ryan Leslie (BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK) via dev <[email protected]> 於 >> 2026年5月15日 凌晨12:55 寫道： >> >> Hi Jiunn-Yang, >> >> Thanks for the new KIP. I like that the approach addresses KIP-1282 concerns >> and is simplified to focus on hot partitions only. >> >> One question is if the config property would be better named as >> auto.offset.reset.latest.min.age.ms instead of auto.offset.reset.max.age >> >> .ms makes the option consistent with others such as default.api.timeout.ms >> and connections.max.idle.ms, and the 'ms' is good in general to communicate >> the expected unit. >> >> The reason I am thinking 'min' instead of 'max' is the latest option will >> apply only if the partition age is at least this value (at a minimum), >> otherwise it will be earliest. So it is min age for latest, max age for >> earliest, but the config is attached to latest. >> >> -Ryan >> >> From: [email protected] At: 05/14/26 07:47:27 UTC-4:00To: >> [email protected] >> Subject: [VOTE] KIP-1327 Prevent Hot Data Loss on Partition Expansion for >> Latest Policy >> >> Hello all >> >> I would like to call a vote on KIP-1327 Prevent Hot Data Loss on Partition >> Expansion for Latest Policy >> >> KIP: >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KY4mGQ> >> >> Discussion thread: >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/bp4zk31zr1sdxjsspg7b7bqddmm9t4gn> >> >> Best Regards, >> Jiunn-Yang >> >
