[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14148559#comment-14148559
 ] 

Ryan Berdeen commented on KAFKA-1631:
-------------------------------------

The patch does look like an improvement to the {{TopicCommand}}, but doesn't 
address the number of under-replicated partitions reported by the brokers. It 
seems like there shouldn't be multiple definitions of "under-replicated 
partition".

> ReplicationFactor and under-replicated partitions incorrect during 
> reassignment
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-1631
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1631
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.1.1
>            Reporter: Ryan Berdeen
>              Labels: newbie
>         Attachments: KAFKA-1631-v1.patch
>
>
> We have a topic with a replication factor of 3. We monitor 
> UnderReplicatedPartitions as recommended by the documentation.
> During a partition reassignment, partitions being reassigned are reported as 
> under-replicated. Running a describe shows:
> {code}
> Topic:activity-wal-1    PartitionCount:15       ReplicationFactor:5     
> Configs:
>         Topic: activity-wal-1   Partition: 0    Leader: 14      Replicas: 
> 14,13,12,11,15        Isr: 14,12,11,13
>         Topic: activity-wal-1   Partition: 1    Leader: 14      Replicas: 
> 15,14,11      Isr: 14,11
>         Topic: activity-wal-1   Partition: 2    Leader: 11      Replicas: 
> 11,15,12      Isr: 12,11,15
> ...
> {code}
> It looks like the displayed replication factor, 5, is simply the number of 
> replicas listed for the first partition, which includes both brokers in the 
> current list and those onto which the partition is being reassigned. 
> Partition 0 is also included in the list when using the 
> `--under-replicated-partitions` option, even though it is replicated to more 
> partitions than the true replication factor.
> During a reassignment, the under-replicated partitions metric is not usable, 
> meaning that actual under-replicated partitions can go unnoticed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to