Hi all,

Have we converged on the schedule that we want to use yet? Based on
the last emails, it is not so clear to me. For your context, I am
trying to figure out the timeline for 4.5.

Best,
David

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 1:03 PM Christo Lolov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think we could be a bit more lax with the KIP freeze of 6.7.0 when
> 2034 comes around to account for LNY :)
>
> Joking aside, my preference between "KIP freeze would be Wednesday's,
> weeks 9 / 25 / 41, with feature freeze +3 weeks, and code freeze +2
> weeks" and "start Q1 release with X buffer after LYN and complete Q3
> release with Y buffer before Christmas" would be to start with the
> first and adjust by shifting by 1 week on individual basis the ones
> which are too close. I am okay with too close being defined as 2
> weeks. Based on your very detailed tables we seem to have only a few
> such outliers in the next decade.
>
> Best,
> Christo
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2026 at 08:35, Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Matthias, you are definitely a master of scheduling! I'm +100 to your plans.
> >
> > Also, it is absolutely helpful to write down the exact release dates for 
> > the next few years at once. It will ease our anxiety a lot! I'd be more 
> > than happy to update the wiki with these dates once we all agree on this 
> > new schedule. For example:
> >
> > Version KIP Freeze      Feature Freeze  Code Freeze     Target Release
> > 4.4.0   Jun 17, 2026    Jul 8, 2026     Jul 22, 2026    Aug 19, 2026
> > 4.5.0   Oct 7, 2026     Oct 28, 2026    Nov 11, 2026    Dec 9, 2026
> > 4.6.0   Mar 3, 2027     Mar 24, 2027    Apr 7, 2027     May 5, 2027
> > 4.7.0   Jun 23, 2027    Jul 14, 2027    Jul 28, 2027    Aug 25, 2027
> > 4.8.0   Oct 13, 2027    Nov 3, 2027     Nov 17, 2027    Dec 15, 2027
> > 4.9.0   Mar 1, 2028     Mar 22, 2028    Apr 5, 2028     May 3, 2028
> > 5.0.0   Jun 21, 2028    Jul 12, 2028    Jul 26, 2028    Aug 23, 2028
> > 5.1.0   Oct 11, 2028    Nov 1, 2028     Nov 15, 2028    Dec 13, 2028
> >
> > Furthermore, let's do our best to avoid fixing release blockers under the 
> > Christmas tree :)
> >
> > On 2026/05/28 21:22:51 "Matthias J. Sax" wrote:
> > > Thanks for the input.
> > >
> > > Overall, it seems that 3+2 weeks for feature freeze / code freeze
> > > windows gets a lot of support.
> > >
> > > However, the idea of dividing the release windows not into 3 equally
> > > long junks, but be more flexible to account for holiday seasons, seems
> > > not to get a lot of support? Not sure why... I personally think it would
> > > be good to take it into account, and I also think that Chia-Ping raises
> > > a very good point.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > @Chia-Ping: Other holidays are a great point. Thanks for raising it. I
> > > did actually briefly think about it, but it's difficult, and thus I just
> > > started with something simple as proposal to kick off a discussion.
> > >
> > > I think, Diwali is short enough to not make it a concern (similar to
> > > Thanksgiving)?
> > >
> > > For Lunar New Year, I agree that it would be good to plan for it.
> > > However, it seems it's shifting quite a lot year-over-year what makes it
> > > very difficult (w/o a huge window) to include?
> > >
> > > Overall, a 5 / 3.5 / 3.5 schedule seems to be quite unbalanced (this
> > > would be 22 / 15 / 15 weeks per release? And two very short 3.5 month
> > > releases does not sound very appealing?
> > >
> > >
> > > I was playing with it a little bit more. Overall we have 52 weeks, so
> > > roughly 17.3 weeks per release. So we can naturally split it into
> > > 17/17/18 using the additional week for the holidays. But that's not good
> > > enough to take both Christmas and Lunar New Year into account. However,
> > > with a 16/16/20, we could make it work I believe, even if it does cut it
> > > tight sometimes... To be able to phrase a "simple rule", we can use ISO
> > > weeks:
> > >
> > > KIP freeze would be Wednesday's, weeks 9 / 25 / 41, with feature freeze
> > > +3 weeks, and code freeze +2 weeks.
> > >
> > > Ie, we put the first KIP freeze after LNY with plenty of buffer for most
> > > years:
> > >
> > > >   
> > > > ┌──────┬────────┬────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┐
> > > >   │ Year │  LNY   │ Q1 KIP freeze (week 9 Wed) │                Buffer  
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2027 │ Feb 6  │ Mar 3                      │ 25 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2028 │ Jan 26 │ Mar 1                      │ 34 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2029 │ Feb 13 │ Feb 28                     │ 15 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2030 │ Feb 3  │ Feb 27                     │ 24 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2031 │ Jan 23 │ Feb 26                     │ 34 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2032 │ Feb 11 │ Feb 25                     │ 14 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2033 │ Jan 31 │ Mar 2                      │ 30 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2034 │ Feb 19 │ Mar 1                      │ 10 days ← tightest 
> > > > with realistic LNY │
> > > >   
> > > > ├──────┼────────┼────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2035 │ Feb 8  │ Feb 28                     │ 20 days                
> > > >                │
> > > >   
> > > > └──────┴────────┴────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────┘
> > >
> > > Guess, we could also make it week-8 instead of 9, and accept that 2034
> > > would cut it too short (or be even more flexible and keep week-9 for
> > > 2034 as an exception to the rule), but that's a single year... for 2029
> > > and 2032 we still have one week buffer.
> > >
> > > For Christmas, we would still ensure that the release can go out on
> > > time, too. The below Q3 target release date is 4 weeks after code
> > > freeze. This is a little bit more tight, as we often need more than 4
> > > weeks to get it done:
> > >
> > > >   ┌──────┬──────────────────────────┬────────────────┐
> > > >   │ Year │ Q3 release (week 50 Wed) │ Days to Dec 25 │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2026 │ Dec 9                    │ 16             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2027 │ Dec 15                   │ 10             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2028 │ Dec 13                   │ 12             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2029 │ Dec 12                   │ 13             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2030 │ Dec 11                   │ 14             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2031 │ Dec 10                   │ 15             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2032 │ Dec 8                    │ 17             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2033 │ Dec 14                   │ 11             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2034 │ Dec 13                   │ 12             │
> > > >   ├──────┼──────────────────────────┼────────────────┤
> > > >   │ 2035 │ Dec 12                   │ 13             │
> > > >   └──────┴──────────────────────────┴────────────────┘
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For some years, we would still cut it a little bit tight, but we could
> > > also apply an exception to the rule, to compensate for it. If we have
> > > enough buffer room from LYN, we can start the Q1 release train a week
> > > earlier, reducing the Q3->Q1 timeline by one week.
> > >
> > >
> > > Curious to hear what people think about it. In the end, if we can agree
> > > on high level rules like "start Q1 release with X buffer after LYN", and
> > > "complete Q3 release with Y buffer before Christmas", and still aim for
> > > an as balance week-allocation per release, we can just put together a
> > > release plan for the next 10 years and be done with it.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/28/26 3:51 AM, Christo Lolov wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for pushing for this! I can confirm that the 4.2.0's release
> > > > coincided with a reasonable amount of holidays, so I would favour a
> > > > 3+2 schedule with releases in March, July and November.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Christo
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:05, Ismael Juma <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 12:44 AM Andrew Schofield 
> > > >> <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I would go for 3 releases of equal lengths in March, July and 
> > > >>> November. I
> > > >>> favour the 3+2 schedule.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Ismael
> > >
> > >

Reply via email to