Hi all,

I also fully support the proposed 3.9.3 release and also willing to pick up
a few open issues to fill the release with more content :)


Thanks,
Gergely

On Tue, 27 Oct 2026 at 10:06, Anton Agestam via dev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> For what it's worth, I think this issue does qualify also as critical, as
> it is currently impossible to make routine node replacements (e.g. in face
> of a single-node loss) during the migration or dual-write phases. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20762.
>
> Den mån 26 okt. 2026 kl 17:18 skrev Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi Tommi
> >
> > I haven’t dug into the KIP yet. As it’s a KIP, it needs to pass the
> > vote before the PR can be merged.
> >
> > If the KIP passes the vote, we can definitely include it in 3.9.3 :)
> >
> > BTW, this thread is for discussing whether we should make the next
> > release for the 3.9 branch, so let’s keep the KIP discussion on its
> > own thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chia-Ping
> >
> > Tommi Vainikainen via dev <[email protected]> 於 2026年10月26日週一
> 下午9:45寫道:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I fully support your efforts regarding 3.9.3 release.
> > >
> > > Do you think that
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/KAFKA/pages/440303727/KIP-1362+Add+a+rollback-compatible+storage+format+option+for+KRaft+migration
> > >
> > > could be something to include in 3.9.3? It seems to be stuck in the KIP
> > > phase, so the pull request is also stuck.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 3:19 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > There are some critical bugs related to ZK migration, so I’d like to
> > > > open a discussion for the 3.9.3 release.
> > > >
> > > > KAFKA-20960: Block ZK-to-KRaft migration finalization until brokers
> > > > re-register (merged)
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/ea11d59ecda2ec57be0f1ef83a554ef5d3b82770
> > > >
> > > > KAFKA-21142: Fix partition creation when handling snapshot delta
> > > > during migration (merged)
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/daebfbd9b37c913937d5adfc2e493fe825e3da3a
> > > >
> > > > KAFKA-21062: Handle BADVERSION on /migration writes (under review)
> > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/23639
> > > >
> > > > My sense is that ZK migration is the only official way to encourage
> > > > users to get into KRaft, so keeping it working is a strong reason to
> > > > do a release.
> > > >
> > > > I haven’t finished reviewing the last one yet, but it would be good
> to
> > > > make sure the release will happen. Otherwise, my tokens will be
> > > > totally wasted :)
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to