Hi Sanghyeok, Thanks for the updates! I'm good with this KIP.
Remember to update the kafka-streams-group.sh page in the developer guide. Cheers, Lucas On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 12:18 AM Sanghyeok An <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lucas, Thanks for taking the time to look into this! > > Thanks for pointing these out. I agree with both LB1 and LB2. > > I've updated the Proposed Changes section, output tables, and Test Plan in > the KIP to address your comments. > When you get a chance, please take another look. > > Best Regards, > Sanghyeok An > > > 2026년 11월 9일 (월) 오후 5:34, Lucas Brutschy via dev <[email protected]>님이 > 작성: > > > Hi Sanghyeok, > > > > Thanks for the KIP, this looks like a useful improvement. > > > > LB1: The GROUP-INSTANCE-ID column is only shown if at least one member > > has an instance ID, but RACK-ID is always shown with --verbose. > > kafka-consumer-groups.sh hides its optional columns when no member has > > the data (the instance ID, and UPGRADED in verbose mode). Should > > RACK-ID follow the same rule? > > > > LB2: In kafka-consumer-groups.sh, a member without an instance ID > > shows an empty cell in the GROUP-INSTANCE-ID column, whereas the KIP > > renders missing values as "-". Should the new column behave like the > > consumer groups one? > > > > Best, > > Lucas > >
