> On March 26, 2015, 12:07 a.m., Jun Rao wrote:
> > core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Replica.scala, lines 52-72
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/6/?file=905875#file905875line52>
> >
> >     Would it be simpler to instead keeping track of a lastCaughtUpTime and 
> > updating it every time readToEndOfEnd is true? If readToEndOfEnd is false, 
> > we will just leave that value untouched.

Good suggestion. I'll update the patch.


- Aditya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/#review77810
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 25, 2015, 8:27 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 25, 2015, 8:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1546
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> PATCH for KAFKA-1546
> 
> 
> PATCH for KAFKA-1546
> 
> Brief summary of changes:
> - Added a lagBegin metric inside Replica to track the lag in terms of time 
> since the replica did not read from the LEO
> - Using lag begin value in the check for ISR expand and shrink
> - Removed the max lag messages config since it is no longer necessary
> - Returning the initialLogEndOffset in LogReadResult corresponding to the the 
> LEO before actually reading from the log.
> - Unit test cases to test ISR shrinkage and expansion
> 
> Updated KAFKA-1546 patch to reflect Neha and Jun's comments
> 
> 
> Addressing Joel's comments
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Partition.scala 
> c4bf48a801007ebe7497077d2018d6dffe1677d4 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Replica.scala 
> bd13c20338ce3d73113224440e858a12814e5adb 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala 
> 06b8ecc5d11a1acfbaf3c693c42bf3ce5b2cd86d 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/FetchDataInfo.scala 
> 26f278f9b75b1c9c83a720ca9ebd8ab812d19d39 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaConfig.scala 
> 46d21c73f1feb3410751899380b35da0c37c975c 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
> c5274822c57bf3c1f9e4135c0bdcaa87ee50ce20 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ISRExpirationTest.scala 
> 92152358c95fa9178d71bd1c079af0a0bd8f1da8 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/KafkaConfigConfigDefTest.scala 
> 191251d1340b5e5b2d649b37af3c6c1896d07e6e 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/LogRecoveryTest.scala 
> 92d6b2c672f74cdd526f2e98da8f7fb3696a88e3 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala 
> efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aditya Auradkar
> 
>

Reply via email to