+1

~ Joestein
On Jun 10, 2015 10:21 PM, "Neha Narkhede" <n...@confluent.io> wrote:

> +1. Thanks Geoff!
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:20 PM -0700, "Gwen Shapira" <
> gshap...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1 (non-binding. Actually, since this is non-binding anyway, lets make
> it +100. I'm so so excited about having a usable testing framework)
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Geoffrey Anderson  wrote:
> > Hi Kafka,
> >
> > After a few rounds of discussion on KIP-25, there doesn't seem to be
> > opposition, so I'd like to propose a vote.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Geoff
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Anderson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi KIP-25 thread,
> >>
> >> I consolidated some of the questions from this thread and elsewhere.
> >>
> >> Q: Can we see a map of what system-test currently tests, which ones we
> >> want to replace and JIRAs for replacing?
> >> A: Initial draft here:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Roadmap+-+port+existing+system+tests
> >>
> >> Q: Will ducktape be maintained separately as a github repo?
> >> A: Yes https://github.com/confluentinc/ducktape
> >>
> >> Q: How easy is viewing the test results and logs, how will test output
> be
> >> structured?
> >> A: Hierarchical structure as outlined here:
> >> https://github.com/confluentinc/ducktape/wiki/Design-overview#output
> >>
> >> Q: Does it support code coverage? If not, how easy/ difficult would it
> be
> >> to support?
> >> A: It does not, and we have no immediate plans to support this.
> Difficulty
> >> unclear.
> >>
> >> Q: It would be nice if each Kafka version that we release will also
> >> have a separate "tests" artifact that users can download, untar and
> easily
> >> run against a Kafka cluster of the same version.
> >> A: This seems reasonable and not too much extra work. Definitely open to
> >> discussion on this.
> >>
> >> Q: Why not share running services across multiple tests?
> >> A: Prefer to optimize for simplicity and correctness over what might be
> a
> >> questionable improvement in run-time.
> >>
> >> Q: Are regressions - in the road map?
> >> A: yes
> >>
> >> Q: Are Jepsen style tests involving network failures in the road map?
> >> A: yes
> >>
> >> Thanks much,
> >> Geoff
> >>
> >>
> >>

Reply via email to