-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/#review88441
-----------------------------------------------------------



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java 
(line 1357)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/#comment140961>

    This seems like one of these things that is clever but invariably ends up 
not quite working. Did we actually determine there is a performance hit from 
just synchronizing. Biased locking and lock elision should make this very cheap 
right? Given we acquire locks for all the perf stats and there are several stat 
updates for each poll call I don't see the problem with just synchronizing.


- Jay Kreps


On June 18, 2015, 9:40 p.m., Jason Gustafson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 18, 2015, 9:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-2168
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2168
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-2168; refactored callback handling to prevent unnecessary requests
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; address review comments
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; fix rebase error and checkstyle issue
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; address review comments and add docs
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; handle polling with timeout 0
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; timeout=0 means return immediately
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; address review comments
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2168; address more review comments
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/Consumer.java 
> 8f587bc0705b65b3ef37c86e0c25bb43ab8803de 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/ConsumerRecords.java 
> 1ca75f83d3667f7d01da1ae2fd9488fb79562364 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/ConsumerWakeupException.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java 
> 951c34c92710fc4b38d656e99d2a41255c60aeb7 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/MockConsumer.java 
> f50da825756938c193d7f07bee953e000e2627d9 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/OffsetResetStrategy.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/Coordinator.java
>  41cb9458f51875ac9418fce52f264b35adba92f4 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/Fetcher.java
>  56281ee15cc33dfc96ff64d5b1e596047c7132a4 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/Heartbeat.java
>  e7cfaaad296fa6e325026a5eee1aaf9b9c0fe1fe 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/RequestFuture.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/SubscriptionState.java
>  cee75410127dd1b86c1156563003216d93a086b3 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/utils/Utils.java 
> f73eedb030987f018d8446bb1dcd98d19fa97331 
>   
> clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/MockConsumerTest.java 
> 677edd385f35d4262342b567262c0b874876d25b 
>   
> clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/CoordinatorTest.java
>  1454ab73df22cce028f41f74b970628829da4e9d 
>   
> clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/FetcherTest.java
>  419541011d652becf0cda7a5e62ce813cddb1732 
>   
> clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/HeartbeatTest.java
>  ecc78cedf59a994fcf084fa7a458fe9ed5386b00 
>   
> clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/SubscriptionStateTest.java
>  e000cf8e10ebfacd6c9ee68d7b88ff8c157f73c6 
>   clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/common/utils/UtilsTest.java 
> 2ebe3c21f611dc133a2dbb8c7dfb0845f8c21498 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Gustafson
> 
>

Reply via email to