+1. This was long due! On 7/14/15, 4:42 PM, "Guozhang Wang" <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1. Thanks Ewen!! > >On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks Ewen for taking on something that the Kafka project has long >>waited >> for! >> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > Super excited! >> > >> > -Jay >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava < >> e...@confluent.io> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Let's start a vote on KIP-26: Add Copycat connector framework for >>data >> > > import/export >> > > >> > > For reference, here's the wiki: >> > > >> > >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58851767 >> > > And the mailing list thread (split across two months): >> > > >> > > >> > >> >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201506.mbox/%3CCAE1jLM >>OEJjnorFK5CtR3g-n%3Dm_AkrFsYeccsB4QimTRfGBrAGQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > > >> > > >> > >> >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201507.mbox/%3CCAHwHRr >>UeNh%2BnCHwCTUCrcipHM3Po0ECUysO%2B%3DX3nwUeOGrcgdw%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > > >> > > Just to clarify since this is a bit different from the KIPs voted >>on so >> > > far, the KIP just covers including Copycat in Kafka (rather than >>having >> > it >> > > as a separate project). While the KIP aimed to be clear about the >>exact >> > > scope, the details require further discussion. The aim is to include >> some >> > > connectors as well, at a minimum for demonstration purposes, but the >> > > expectation is that connector development will, by necessity, be >> > federated. >> > > >> > > I'll kick it off with a +1 (non-binding). >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Thanks, >> > > Ewen >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Neha >> > > > >-- >-- Guozhang
