[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14628373#comment-14628373
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-2335:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user hachikuji opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/78

    KAFKA-2335; fix comment about thread safety

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/hachikuji/kafka KAFKA-2335

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/78.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #78
    
----
commit ee63ed5b5537d31566a08bd2772db83c2fdc9d11
Author: Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
Date:   2015-07-15T17:10:01Z

    KAFKA-2335; fix comment about thread safety

----


> Javadoc for Consumer says that it's thread-safe
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-2335
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2335
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ismael Juma
>            Assignee: Jason Gustafson
>
> This looks like it was left there by mistake:
> {quote}
>  * The consumer is thread safe but generally will be used only from within a 
> single thread. The consumer client has no threads of it's own, all work is 
> done in the caller's thread when calls are made on the various methods 
> exposed.
> {quote}
> A few paragraphs below it says:
> {quote}
> The Kafka consumer is NOT thread-safe. All network I/O happens in the thread 
> of the application making the call. It is the responsibility of the user to 
> ensure that multi-threaded access is properly synchronized. Un-synchronized 
> access will result in {@link ConcurrentModificationException}.
> {quote}
> This matches what the code does, so the former quoted section should probably 
> be deleted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to