[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14905364#comment-14905364
 ] 

Onur Karaman commented on KAFKA-2409:
-------------------------------------

Yeah I think KAFKA-2403's change to have OffsetAndMetadata for committed() and 
long for position() makes more sense than the ticket's originally proposed Long 
for committed() and long for position()

> Have KafkaConsumer.committed() return null when there is no committed offset
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-2409
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2409
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>            Assignee: Sreepathi Prasanna
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie
>             Fix For: 0.9.0.0
>
>
> Currently checking whether an offset has been committed requires catching 
> NoOffsetForPartitionException. Since this is likely a fairly common case, it 
> is more convenient for users just to return null.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to