Todd, There is a discuss thread for this KIP and we talked about it during the KIP call yesterday. I'm more than happy to add detail to the KIP if you bring it up in the discuss thread. I'd rather not stop the vote thread, though.
Thanks, -Flavio > On 21 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > While this is a great idea, is it really ready for vote? I don't see any > detail in the wiki about what trees will be secured, and whether or not > that is configurable. I also don't see anything about how the use of admin > tools is going to be addressed. > > -Todd > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Is it worth mentioning the follow up steps that were discussed in the KIP >> call in this KIP document? Some of them were: >> >> - Adding SSL support for Zookeeper >> - Removing the "world readable" assumption >> >> Thank you, >> Grant >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Onur Karaman < >> okara...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for the feedback so far. At this point, I'd like to >> start >>>> a vote for KIP-38. >>>> >>>> Summary: Add support for ZooKeeper authentication >>>> KIP page: >>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-38%3A+ZooKeeper+Authentication >>>> < >>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-38:+ZooKeeper+Authentication >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Flavio >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Grant Henke >> Software Engineer | Cloudera >> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke >>
