I am using java client and kafka 0.8.2, since events are corrupted in
kafka broker i cant read and replay them again.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sunil,
>
> The messages in Kafka has a CRC stored with each of them. When consumer
> receives a message, it will compute the CRC from the message bytes and
> compare it to the stored CRC. If the computed CRC and stored CRC does not
> match, that indicates the message has corrupted. I am not sure in your case
> why the message is corrupted. Corrupted message seems to  be pretty rare
> because the broker actually validate the CRC before it stores the messages
> on to the disk.
>
> Is this problem reproduceable? If so, can you find out the messages that
> are corrupted? Also, are you using the Java clients or some other clients?
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, sunil kalva <kalva.ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > can some one help me out here.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:36 PM, sunil kalva <kalva.ka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > > I am seeing few messages getting corrupted in kafka, It is not
> happening
> > > frequently and percentage is also very very less (less than 0.1%).
> > >
> > > Basically i am publishing thrift events in byte array format to kafka
> > > topics(with out encoding like base64), and i also see more events than
> i
> > > publish (i confirm this by looking at the offset for that topic).
> > > For example if i publish 100 events and i see 110 as offset for that
> > topic
> > > (since it is in production i could not get exact messages which causing
> > > this problem, and we will only realize this problem when we consume
> > because
> > > our thrift deserialization fails).
> > >
> > > So my question is, is there any magic byte which actually determines
> the
> > > boundary of the message which is same as the byte i am sending or or
> for
> > > any n/w issues messages get chopped and stores as one message to
> multiple
> > > messages on server side ?
> > >
> > > tx
> > > SunilKalva
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to