[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15211231#comment-15211231
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-3463:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user hachikuji opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1140

    KAFKA-3463: change default receive buffer size for consumer to 64K

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/hachikuji/kafka KAFKA-3463

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1140.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1140
    
----
commit 3bd92aea373dad3c8cbdc0ee3f99e7d035f99b63
Author: Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
Date:   2016-03-25T00:57:31Z

    KAFKA-3463: change default receive buffer size for consumer to 64K

----


> Change default consumer receive buffer size to 64K
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3463
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3463
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: consumer
>            Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>            Assignee: Jason Gustafson
>             Fix For: 0.10.0.0
>
>
> In KAFKA-3135, users have reported a strange pause when consuming data using 
> the new consumer. This can be easily reproduced with the console consumer, 
> but the root cause has so far proven elusive. Interestingly, the pause can 
> also be reproduced with the old consumer if you change the socket buffer size 
> to 32K to match the new consumer's default. Similarly, by increasing the new 
> consumer's connection receive buffer size to 64K to match the old consumer's 
> default, the problem seems to be mitigated (I am unable to reproduce it 
> locally with this setting, though others have reported that its impact is 
> merely reduced). Since there doesn't appear to be a good reason to have 
> lowered the default for the new consumer, we may as well revert to the old 
> consumer's default of 64K and accept the mitigation until an actual fix is 
> found. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to