My bad, I moved the config option to rejected alternatives. The new method getSupportedPrincipalTypes is what the KIP is proposing.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > My appologies, but I need to retract my vote. > > The KIP currently specifies two alternatives (none rejected). So I'm not > sure what I'm voting on... > > For reference, my original +1 was for the new method: > getSupportedPrincipalTypes() > I'm not even sure how would a config work in that case. > > Anyway, we need to resolve this before voting. > > Gwen > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1. > > > > It's a small change and I can see how this will help improve usability > for > > some of the authorizers. > > > > Gwen > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Guys, > >> > >> I would like to open the vote for KIP-50. > >> > >> KIP: > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-50+-+Enhance+Authorizer+interface+to+be+aware+of+supported+Principal+Types > >> > >> Discuss thread: here > >> < > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201603.mbox/%3CCAGQG9cUCLDO0owdziDcL9iStXNF1wURyVNcEZedQJg%3DUuC7j%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > > >> > >> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3186 > >> > >> PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/861 > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Regards, > >> Ashish > >> > > > > > -- Regards, Ashish
