[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15250849#comment-15250849
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-3117:
---------------------------------------
GitHub user hachikuji opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1247
KAFKA-3117: handle metadata updates during consumer rebalance
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/hachikuji/kafka KAFKA-3117
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1247.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1247
----
commit 6a4fa54a03e9b9a1c3d8512728d50075e7aa7c31
Author: Jason Gustafson <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-04-20T21:37:22Z
KAFKA-3117: handle metadata updates during consumer rebalance
----
> Fail test at: PlaintextConsumerTest. testAutoCommitOnRebalance
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-3117
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3117
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: consumer
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0
> Environment: oracle java764bit
> ubuntu 13.10
> Reporter: edwardt
> Assignee: Jason Gustafson
> Labels: newbie, test, transient-unit-test-failure
>
> java.lang.AssertionError: Expected partitions [topic-0, topic-1, topic2-0,
> topic2-1] but actually got [topic-0, topic-1]
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at kafka.utils.TestUtils$.waitUntilTrue(TestUtils.scala:730)
> at
> kafka.api.BaseConsumerTest.testAutoCommitOnRebalance(BaseConsumerTest.scala:125)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:22
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
